Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

kalashnikov& idiot

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
588,753
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 23, 2007

compare please with this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPPRZz2DSUA better than American troops

  • likes, 150 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (devrimyz)

  • idiot & kalashnikov oder mp40. scheisse egal.

Top Comments

  • Очень скоро ребят вот в такой форме будут убивать из АК 74 и он осечек давать не будет))

  • Енто китайский калаш. Или болгарский))) Хер его знает

see all

All Comments (1,352)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @amyhuk The deterrence was that NATO threaten to use battlefield nukes in case of near overrun.

    Soviet answer was if NATO force use nukes on Soviet army, Soviet would use nukes on Europe cities.

    NATO answer was to have US nuke Soviet cities.

    In the end, the Cold War was balanced by a weak conventional NATO force, threat of nuclear use on Soviet armies, European, Soviet and American cities. And Cold War didn't go hot; except in patron states.

  • @amyhuk The exchange rate isn't good overall for the USSR but consider this: 1) US had less alive troops than dead USSR. 2) the poor exchange rate was compounded by poor initial performance but by war's end USSR possessed the most powerful land force all round.

    During the Cold War, Warsaw Pact force outnumbered NATO force 3 to 1 overall and nearly 10 to 1 in case of actual attack in points of penetration. It was a real fear that Soviet conventional force will roll over Europe back then.

  • @amyhuk The comparison has no meaning unless you account for how many Axis soldiers are killed in exchange for the casualties. Killing 10 when losing 10 is not the same as killing 40 losing 10. It says how much you were opposing and correct for replacements of dead troops

    For that from 1939-1945, Allied force killed some 130k Axis troops in exchange for over 100k dead.

    During the war, Soviet killed some 5 mil in exchange for 8.

  • @Dimych187 я не пендос ты ошибся, только и земли хватит, а оружие как было херовое так и осталось, а солдаты русские это вообще ничто. Говно блядь, которое обосралось в чечне и афганистане.

  • @The364847 Релаксируй пендос!)) Россия большая! Хватит земли что бы закопать всю армию США!)))))

  • @Dimych187

    Очень скоро ребята в такой форме будут убивать тебя, полудурок

  • у второго румынский АКМ 7.62. с рукоятью на цивье...

  • @airzorne its more likely to say that russia has the united states to thank for not speaking german by denying the axis powers of their oil fields in the middle east and north africa and eventually yugoslavia which halted german incursion into russian territory face it the only reason they stoped advancing is cause they ran out of gas they met little to no real resistance from the russian army. unless you call futile human waves of conscripts armed with a mosin nagant OR amo resistance

  • @airzorne please nigga germany didnt have the logistics to form an invasion of the US. and even if he tried he would of been met my 40 million marksmen. on top of the regular army.

  • @airzorne ya because Rommel was a push over right? he only led old men and children? listen to yourself

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more