Our President

Starting in 2007 there will be campaigns on all sides from the political parties. This video is to give an example of what we SHOULD NOT elect into office again...

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• President
• George
• W.
• Bush

[intellectualscum]

Isn't it though. And it's not like it would do one damn bit of good because it's not like the president (especially this one) ever makes any real decisions on his own. The president is just a front man for the real mafia who runs things behind the scenes.

[AxleNox]

I have an idea 0_o Let's give Bush a pretzel.

[beavisCS]

LOL you people FAIL better vote for bush look at it this way: the politics will do anyways the plan they have to follow. bush gave us some smiles at least!!! look at obama what did he done good for the people of america tell me please!

[JudyGurl]

Pauly, as for bone fragments here and this type debris there and this and that found at the scene.....there is no way to scientifically know as fact what will happen and what it should look like when a plane hit's a tall building, weakens the structure, and it comes down. Guess, yes. Know as fact what to expect or what you'd find....um, no.

[JudyGurl]

Well, now that you've shown off your penchant for using big words and making a pretentious boob of yourself, may I make a rebuttle ? As long as you adhere to the premise that explosives were planted ahead of time in the WTC buildings, I'm not sure you're capable of reason. None of the "evidence" you've pointed out points to a pre designed and planned implosion of the buildings. It's quite simple really. A plane hit tower 1 then a plane hit tower 2. They subsequently came down. Period.

[paulymac]

An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument to the man" or "argument against the man") consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to a characteristic or belief of the person making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence against the claim.

The process of proving or disproving the claim is thereby subverted, and the argumentum ad hominem works to change the subject.

[JudyGurl]

pauly, next time Rosie O'Donnell offers you kool-aid, just say no.

[paulymac]

I'm not saying the U.S govt did anything. I'm saying the offical story ("Pancake Theory") is a LIE. you can see explosions 40 floors below the "collapse" on the twin towers. 100's of firefighters reported explosions. Bone fragments on rooftops of surrounding buildings. William Rodriguez report of a bomb in the basement. The recent discovery of thermate in the dust. Molten metal below the rubble pile. The first responders boots melted because of the heat. There is plenty of physical evidence.

[JudyGurl]

So, you're saying the U.S. govt purposefully killed 2000+ innoncent American citizens. There's only one problem with your theory. It's complete and utter BULLSHIT. And may I point out that you are merely 'saying' that "3 Manhattan skyscrapers reduced to rubble could only be the result of a controlled domolition" and then saying "watch the video"...again, no EVIDENCE, just opinion

[paulymac]

look at the evidence. 3 Manhattan skyscrapers reduced to rubble could only be the result of a controlled demolition. You can believe NIST and their junk science. I on the other hand believe in common sense. Watch the videos, it's pretty damn obvious if your not suffering from cognitive dissonance.

[JudyGurl]

9/11 was an inside job ? OMG I thought you wackos had finally quit pushing that nonsense. Tell ya what.....remit any evidence you've found that 9/11 was not solely the work of Islmic extremeists. tell us any evidence you have that it was our own government that had any part in this.

[paulymac]

Bush was a NWO puppet. 9/11 was an inside job and the people responsible are still in power today.