Ship fires missile
Loading...
22,485
Loading...
Uploader Comments (NavalDesigners)
see all
All Comments (9)
-
she is not the cool as the real Venator class.
-
Venator? Somone has been watching Star Wars!
-
looks like essm
-
if this is a concept is very good
-
HAMMERRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
- Loading comment...
Loading...
That is one clever design, aren't BMT based in bath?
sethburgess1234 2 years ago
BMT Defence Services is based in Bath and Weymouth (in the UK). The BMT Group has circa 30 subsidiaries around the world.
NavalDesigners 2 years ago
Thanks for your observation, 95predator. A key difference between ESSM and CAMM lies in the vertical launch profile. The motor on ESSM ignites in the silo; CAMM is ejected by a gas generator so all you see is a black puff of smoke until the missile tips onto intercept azimuth when the motor ignites. The absence of hot efflux gases spilling over ship's surfaces adjacent to the silo allows naval architects to consider installing such missiles on smaller platforms, where space is tighter.
NavalDesigners 2 years ago
nice vid, Question i have is: Is this launch vessel, Venator; was it produced to be a contender for a project of a specific nation or aimed generically at shoe sting budget navies?
I ask as it appears to be very similar for what is envisaged for the C.3 requirement (formally part of the FSC project, to provide expeditionary MCM, AuxCombatant, Patrol, Flying the flag etc.
AerospaceEngineer90 2 years ago
Thanks for your enquiry.
In general, the R&D work we do is often based around 'near term' future programme requirements as we understand them, as this allows us to base our thinking on real world issues. Our original concept for Venator was informed by C3 requirements for FSC, as we then understood them to be.
We also intended it as a 'vehicle' for exploring our ideas wrt RECONFIGURABILITY of a single mission vessel (as opposed to an all singing all dancing modular, multi-mission warship).
NavalDesigners 2 years ago