9/11 Debunked: WTC 7's Collapse Explained

PLEASE NOTE: This video was made in September 2007. The official investigation into the collapse of WTC7 at this time was still ongoing and did its final report was not released until more than a year later, in December 2008. Therefore, everything in this video was based on their working hypotheses at the time, and it should come as no surprise that when the investigation concluded, some of their findings varied from their early hypotheses (as in any investigation). Namely, the claim in this video that the fires were "likely fed by a series of diesel generators" turned out not to be the case, and the hypothesis that the collapse started with Truss 1 was also incorrect. The collapse actually started in the same vicinity only a few floors up, with the collapse of Column 79. However, neither of these two greatly alter the overall conclusions for the mechanism of the collapse. I would go in and make these changes in the video itself, but all the video's data was on an old computer that I got rid of literally years ago.

Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.

TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7 WTC7 Pentagon missile Global Hawk Twin Towers squibs thermite thermate explosives Popular Mechanics truth movement inside job collapse bombs explosions Loose Change recut 2nd second cut Final Cut 9/11 Mysteries coincidences Alex Jones Show Illuminati New World Order NWO Dylan Avery Jason Bermas Korey Rowe Sophia Shafquat Steven Jones James Jim Fetzer David Ray Griffin Kevin Barrett Ryan Judy Wood Richard Gage Architects Engineers Scholars Pilots Patriots Question 9/11 Truth truthers twoof twoofers debunking debunkers

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• World
• Trade
• Center
• Building
• conspiracy
• controlled
• demolition
• squibs
• explosives
• truth
• WTC7

[MrKoolaidesmile]

what a crock of fucking shit !!!!!

[LHOdidntdoit]

@CodeTwo2 only know nothings dont know its been proven.

Repeatedly.

[MrSkunkwork100]

@CodeTwo2 "What a fabulous addition to the debate... explains everything."

Indeed.

[CodeTwo2]

@MrSkunkwork100 "Without the damage impetus, the buildings would be standing today."

What a fabulous addition to the debate... explains everything.

[CodeTwo2]

@LHOdidntdoit "CD is for complete dopes."

Unqualified, uncalculated, open-ended arbitrary statements of what "must have" happened or what could "never happen", without any proof, is for dopes.

[MrSkunkwork100]

@CodeTwo2 "What a crock of shit, you pillock... implying the building's own design allowed destruction."

That's actually not what I said at all. Reading and comprehending a statement would benefit you greatly, as would actually reading the report.

"There was NOTHING compromized in all the perfectly sound structure from below the points of plane impact...and NO inherent tendency of the system to self-destroy."

Without the damage impetus, the buildings would be standing today.

[CynthiaOwens]

@LHOdidntdoit "The MASS IN MOTION downwards could never be stopped."

SO YOU ADMIT RESISTANCE WHICH FREE FALL IS IMPOSSIBLE.

OWNED ANOTHER ONE OF MY SONS FAGGOT DISINFORMANT FRIENDS

CALL ME IF YOU WANT RYANS ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER AND LIFE HISTORY. HE IS MY TRAITOR SON I HAVE DISOWNED BECAUSE OF HIS LIES AND PROPAGANDA SUPPORTING FALSE FLAG ATTACKS

Cynthia O Owens

(423) 913-0562

276 Hartman Rd

Jonesborough, TN 37659-3720