If you are really counting on some piece of machinery to to adjust your flash automatically you might as well switch your camera to Auto. This is not for real photographers. I'll bet you a 100,000 dollars that most of the model-lying-by-the-pool photos so far have been taken without a pocket wizard. So, learn your manual settings and don't spend on BS devices. This is how you can be a great photographer.
@Kkunchev You can still shoot manually using a pocket wizard. It seems like a good wireless way of triggering your off-camera flash.
brianv00 3 months ago
If you are really counting on some piece of machinery to to adjust your flash automatically you might as well switch your camera to Auto. This is not for real photographers. I'll bet you a 100,000 dollars that most of the model-lying-by-the-pool photos so far have been taken without a pocket wizard. So, learn your manual settings and don't spend on BS devices. This is how you can be a great photographer.
Kkunchev 5 months ago
Thank you. Great video....
session036 10 months ago
PW's do not work at all with canon flashes
There are a lot of complaints about this issue (just google)
1TOMDEWITTE 10 months ago
would this work with the canon ae-1?
NO0Bstatus 10 months ago
@prmass1 You get what you pay for.
shaneuk666 1 year ago
@sethx9 Nikon CLS :D but agree pocket wizard is better because you don't have to see the flash.
a6km 1 year ago
what a hottie :D
a6km 1 year ago
Almost $500 for a pcoket wizard?
prmass1 1 year ago
@RLJSlick Like what? What cheaper option would you recommend?
sethx9 1 year ago