Uploader Comments (ChessNetwork)
Top Comments
-
Your previous software was much better than this one. Please use the old one for the next video.
All Comments (111)
-
@ChessNetwork This might be the single best response to a hater. One paragraph of whining put down with two letters xD
-
@KingCrassusII That's so cheezy.
-
You ramble too much.
-
Looks like he guy doesn't know about chess, but I appreciate the contribution for cosily watching some top-class game while eating lunch at the sofa :)
-
Shirov's head got pawnd for 240 gold!
-
@mohakmehta Yes thats why I disliked video.
-
Anand plays very well as black.
-
@ChessNetwork some people just don't know how to appreciate other people's efforts in showing an analysis of a game... much better not minding these stupid guys.....you did an excellent job....works pretty well for me in understanding the logic of the moves, thanks to you.....some people just criticize...i bet they don't even know how to create such video analysis on their own....great job btw.
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If you're "analyzing" a video, you have to do your homework.
Can't get away without knowing the exact series of moves. And 5 mins. to explain "bad" and "good" bishop in a game-analysis of WCs ! I watched this with much expectation, but your analysis and the reasons you give behind the moves are just plain stupid. There are a lot of reasons, why a certain move was played. If u are analyzing, try to show the beauty of calculation. That's what it is about !
mohakmehta 7 months ago
@mohakmehta oh
ChessNetwork 7 months ago 3
@ChessNetwork I play the caro kann religiously and in my opinion you did a good job analyzing this video. The good bishop vs bad bishop in the caro kann was quite logical to me, and I don't know why some people said you didn't explain this correctly.
TheUniverseNow 7 months ago
@TheUniverseNow :)
ChessNetwork 7 months ago
Knight in the corner's a horror
ColdDadaNothing 8 months ago
@ColdDadaNothing :)
ChessNetwork 8 months ago