Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

RE: Anticommie

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
155 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 18, 2009

I disagree...yet again

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (jesuriah)

  • yes... circular reasoning is stupid, but evolution (meaning bacteria -> monkey -> man) is wrong...

    evolution is not caught in the act... the only "proof" are some bones (not only bones, you know what I mean) that put in relation with one another you can find an evolving pattern..

    When the transformation will be observed then evolution would have a foot to stand on.

    Example: the ford model T did not evolve into the latest mustang by itself... You don't look at the cars and say "evolution" do you?

  • @dantheman1507 "but evolution (meaning bacteria -> monkey -> man) is wrong..."

    Your version of it, yes.

    "evolution is not caught in the act."

    Care to explain nylonase then? Or how about ring species? How about the E. Coli long term evolution product?

    Cars don't reproduce, your analogy is hackneyed as well as flawed. Take my creationist challenge.

  • @jesuriah

    cars don't, robots might... let's see them evolve

  • @dantheman1507 How can something with no genes undergo gene mutation?

    It's clear to me you don't understand evolution, at all.

  • Great points all around, but especially at the end. You're spot on there bro! They have to learn our position before they attempt to try and debunk it. Outstanding example with the snake and the orange.

  • Thanks, and sorry for the late response. I noticed someone downthumbed your comment instead of actually responding to it. I'd bet it was a fucktard, and one who requires the dark Socratic method.

see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @jesuriah

    dude... still it's not caught in the act

  • @HelplessVictim

    like my piss

  • No, it makes sense. If you could get an award for being a loser, then this guy would be so much of a loser he couldn't get the reward. X=-infinity, thus x<y, whereas y= the biggest loser of the current award ceremony. Once again, you fail at logic. Please either educate yourself or sterilize yourself..

  • All of my responses are toned against the statements made to provoke them.

    If you have one family, CONSISTING OF TWO PARENTS, and then those children interbreed, that fits the stereotype of an inbred Alabama/Texas/Louisiana satirical family.

    Congratulations, you are FULL of fail.

  • PUHAHHAAH before you try insulting anybody, you should look at yourself.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more