Pro-Abortion Chalker Caught in the Act

One of the people who has been plastering the sidewalk with pro abortion messages across the street from the Kelowna abortuary was caught in the act the the evening before our weekly pro life vigil on August 24th, 2009. The woman, who refused to identify herself, admitted to having 2 abortions, something all the pro lifers highly suspected, and was doing this so that "women don't need to feel guilty about having an abortion."

Unfortunately, much of the audio is not discernable due to the inferior quality of the video device (cell phone). Essentially, most of her responses to my inquiries are interruptions and involve going off tangents about poverty, rape, abuse, and the so-called "patriarchical society" in which we live.

I can't help but feel sorry for this woman. She is an angry, guilt-ridden product of the feminist agenda that teaches women are suppressed, men are the suppressors, and the unborn are nothing by "tissue." She now has to live with the fact that she has killed 2 of her own children, a deeply rooted trauma that is easily recognizable in her actions, her views, and even in her facial expressions.

I pray she one day finds healing and forgiveness for her past abortions. . .

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• abortion
• pro
• life
• choice
• kelowna
• chalk
• abortuary
• mill

[Furicist]

Good on her, you bible bashing dictators.

Let people make their own choices and stop pushing your views on other people.

The rights which afford you your borderline harrassment also allows her to make a counter-statement in a much more respectful way.

[lambchopclmt]

Nope, i just have ALOT of opinions and beliefs about it, it's inside the body of a woman, doesnt have memory, doesnt have emotion, it's not a person.

the bottom line is, until it's born and isnt inside the body depending on a woman, it doesnt get rights. ANd until you can carry a fetus inside your body productivly you really dont have a say in the matter, keep preaching, but it doesnt change the fact that you have no way to understand the things a woman goes through or decisions she has to make.

[HeisLord9876]

@816messiah I think that the man involved in the pregnancy should be held legally responsible for that child together with the woman both before and after birth. That can only happen if the developing child is given legal status. There should be a huge effort made to do everything to support the pregnant woman -- that's where a man's dollars should be going, if he impregnated . Some women would still risk aborting, as people still drink and drive, in spite of every warning to them.

[HeisLord9876]

@Furicist I think that as long as abortion is legal and the unborn child has no legal status, the man involved has no legal responsibility for the pregnancy. I think that should change. I think there should be an equal legal responsibility, where both man and woman are held legally responsible for the life of the developing child. The child needs protection, nurturing, and support both before and after birth from both parties involved.

[816messiah]

"God" doesnt just kill babies....he kills everything.

If these fundamentalist hate-mongers (pro-lifers) had their way and abortion was made illegal what would happen?

Illegal and unprofessional abortions will rise, of course raising the death toll in young woman...because lets face it, with no legal rights to perform the act, there will be no protection when it goes wrong.

Two, Adding thousands more to welfare seems like a good way to help our economy....

[Furicist]

Mocking someone in the street on camera for their views and putting it on the internet makes you a hypocrite.

I honestly have no patience for people who try to justify their blinkered view on the world under the guise of faith to a God whose entire existence is claimed by faith and faith alone.

[MARLONBART]

Many people believe our value originates from God. Others believe it is something that has evolved.

Most people recognize there is something wrong with killing human beings. That is why virtually all societies have laws against doing so (murder).

It is those that equate human beings with animals who are the dangerous ones.

They seem to believe that killing a human is no more "wrong" than killing animals, insects, whatever.

If you are living, whole, and human (DNA), you are a "human being."

[Pelonetillo]

judging by your refusal to provide a valid answer, you must not really know why you hold the position you do. you say "value," when asked what value you vacillate. if you dont know just say so.

[MARLONBART]

@Pelonetillo Again, the more concerning issue, the one who should be grilled, is the one advocating for the killing of innocent human beings. He is the dangerous one, not the one who respects human life and refrains from killing it.

[Pelonetillo]

what value. thats not really an answer. how do you appraise humans? whats your criteria?