Basic abstract algebra, pt.14
Uploader Comments (VeritySeeker)
Top Comments
-
Brilliant. Don't stop making these or we will just have to go back to seeing monkeys drink their own urine.
-
Looking forward to more!
All Comments (22)
-
I've found in my undergraduate math studies that a small dry erase board w/ some markers is an invaluable study tool. Beats burning a hole in paper with an eraser lol.
-
Great videos!! I was confused at first though when you were defining cosets. The vertical "such that" line looks like the line you used for "divides". As in 4|8
-
Around 2:55 you say that "It is possible that to prove that..... H in G" and then suddenly it changes to G in H? Maybe just a mistake or i don't understand it?
-
mind = blown
-
ALL IN EVERYWHERE WAS LISTENIG THIS VIDEO ALSO I UNDERSTOOD IT(DANYLO)-THE SMALL GOD
-
indeed! that's great. one of the most enjoyable and comprehensible videos on the server. At the vert beginning the music seemed a bit disturbing but now I cannot image any other music played here:)
-
more more more! I love em!
im hoping when you said the same remainder when dividing by n!, that the ! is purely an exclamation
colverjustin 1 year ago
@colverjustin I hope so too ;). Yes, you're right.
VeritySeeker 1 year ago
i'm having trouble understand the notation you use for defining sets: ex. gH={gh|hЄH}. First I thought that | meant divides, but now I see that it is equal to : as it appears in my book, which means "as this statement stands". Am I right?
interted 2 years ago
Hi, yes you are right. A way to read it is like this:
{gh | h in H}
All of the form gh such that h is in H.
I read | as "such that".
So it would be every element that is equal to gh for some h in H. Or... all gh, as h runs through H. Many ways to think of it, and pick the one you prefer.
Yes you are right it is the same as : in your book. Some use that notation aswell.
VeritySeeker 2 years ago