Has history been tampered with? Moses upon the fiery mountain Vesuvius? Inverted maps?
Uploader Comments (mithec)
All Comments (30)
-
if this is true then it would be gods will. it would be his will for you, to be telling me this. and it would be gods will that i dont believe you. your not getting the real point that god was giving. the only only thing that you can possibly take with you when you die is the, lives that you touch and the choices that you make. so its not when where or how -- it is the message, that you are supposed to learn from. the only thing that we were given was choice! and use the past to make right ones
-
if this is true then it would be gods will. it would be his will for you, to be telling me this. and it would be gods will that i dont believe you. your not getting the real point that god was giving. the only only thing that you can possibly take with you when you die is the, lives that you touch and the choices that you make. so its not when where or how -- it is the message, that you are supposed to learn from. the only thing that we were given was choice! and use the past to make right ones.
-
Interesting .... no doubt history isn't
what we've been led to believe
In fact, neither is reality
Me believes
-
There is NO evidence for the existence of Moses.
-
I agreed with most of your other comments but your view of Christianity seems slightly over-righteous. No offense intended.
All religions grows and changes over time or at some point. Even the Chunch's stand changes as the Pope changes. Customs and cultures changes along with its people. Nothing is spared.
-
On aura jamais fini d'etudier et de reviser toute l'Histoire.
-
"Hinduism" is just the European umbrella term for the indigenous religions of India. It is incredibly diverse (330 million gods!) and continues to grow and change (there are gurus there today that are worshiped by some people). So while it probably contains some things that are very old, much of it is post-Christian, and influenced by Christianity, and other religions.
-
Dionysius is credited in these lists with "changing water into wine" like Jesus did at the Wedding of Cana (jars of hand washing water became good wine). Rather, Dionysius' temple would sometimes leak wine, or people would leave empty bowls in the Temple overnight and the next day they'd be filled with wine.
This is why the copycat theory isn't taken seriously by modern accademics. It sounds impressive at first, until you try tracking down some of the references & see how tortured they are.
-
Horus was never crucified, but killed by a scorpion in his youth (and brought back to life by his mother's magic), and was concieved when he mother had sex with his father's corpse (after it was torn apart by his mortal enemy, his mother sewed it back together and in some versions revived it just long enough to have sex with it, in other versions she impregnated herself with his reversed penis). Mithras was born from a rock, fully grown (and some shepherds helped pull him out).
Basically, these conspiracy theories lack even the most basic understanding of how history is done, and instead resort to simplistic assumptions of mass forgetfulness and over-arching conspiracy and disinformation campaigns. No wonder the one promoting it is out of his field of expertise... seek the truth!
XSC3 4 years ago
archaeological, dendro-chronological, paleo-graphical and radiocarbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artefacts and found them non-independent, non-exact, statistically implausible, contradictory and viciously circular because they are based on concensual chronology. google>books>fomenko
mithec 4 years ago
Hmm, Christ was born in the middle ages? Gee, that's a neat trick! Then how come we have late 1st and 2nd century writers commenting extensively on his life and quoting from the New Testament at length? The writings of Irenaeus of Lyons alone contradict this ridiculous kooky revisionist "history" (I hestitate to call it "history" done by non-historians...).
XSC3 4 years ago
'ancient' writers were all medieval ones writing under 'ancient' pseuodonims. the was quite a market for 'antiquity' in xv-xvii cy.
mithec 4 years ago
before commenting: google>books>fomenko, thank you for your time.
mithec 4 years ago