Road Test: 2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8
Top Comments
All Comments (40)
-
Make the car slightly lighter and lower and smaller for better performance.
-
Nice drift at 2:53
-
@nismofury While what you say is correct, you can't compare the Challenger to the Camaro and Mustang. Both of those have become sports cars being lighter weight and focused on speed. The Challenger is the last remaining MUSCLE car left. It weighs more, it's bigger, and it's focused on engine power instead of optimum performance. That's what I love about the Challenger, it pays the most tribute to the old ones. This 392 has a ton of torque and it's a comfortable car to be in.
-
This is a srt version which is suppose to be a performance model. It costs thousands more and can only keep up with a mustang gt or camaro ss. A srt is suppose to compete with the like of a shelby gt500 or a camaro lz1. V6 versions of the mustang and camaro can beat the rt version. Dodge needs to step it up and add mopar parts to the rt and srt versions and slap on a supercharger to compete.
-
I love the cheese graphics and sound effects!
-
@ba11izlife challenger destroys the camaro but the camaro is better for the money so camaro wins!
-
challanger are expensive and sucks. camaro for the win!
-
"392Drags" on Youtube 12.4
"392 Hemi Challenger vs 350Z" 12.4
-
@FuriousPumpkin yessssss, hit the nail on the head!!!!!
motorweek rules. Kind of like the news on PBS, it's not flashy but very informative and actually better than most.
FuriousPumpkin 8 months ago 31
@richarddbeck If you knew anything about the Challenger, you'd know it's a Muscle car, NOT a sports car. There is a fine difference between the two. This car is no joke, it's one serious machine and I'd like to see you make a car this nice.
mhtube01 3 weeks ago