Beyond Energy: Using Fusion to Understand the Universe
Top Comments
All Comments (34)
-
using any working perpetual motion like to understand the universe. Like recycling .
-
not sure. i have to look into this "cold fusion" bit, which has been discredited, but i've heard that this was done because of Big Oil, too
-
@kroovyandcal I thought he was referring to the potential of fusion technology to allow e.g. creation of supernovae on earth, since stars operate on the principle of fusion
-
@marsCubed Labs are obviously getting reactions, producing result, and data that suggest that nuclear fusion is occurring. And I think I have sufficiently made my argument sound.
-
@marsCubed Fleischmann and Pons should have verified there experiment better instead of the media glitz announcement. It pissed off the hot fusion “need to speed billions” gang. Their jobs were threatened and the simplicity embarrassed them, so cold fusion was ridiculed into oblivion by the established corporate sponsored academia, but the problem is that it’s not going away.
-
@marsCubed Her team has proven that fusion has taken place by tracking neutrons coming off the experiment. Then it goes on to the pejorative jest you quoted from Dr. Close.
Obviously there are 2 opposing camps on the issue, one uses science and experimentation to prove its case, the other just uses denial, so you tell me, which side is best demonstrating the scientific method?
-
@marsCubed Dr. Close of course remained skeptical, but in the same article, Dr. Pamela Boss employed by the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Centre in San Diego, California, produced cold fusion by placing electrodes in an electrolyte made up of heavy water, which contains deuterium. Dr. Boss and her colleagues reported that one of the electrodes in their experiment got hot, an effect they attribute to fusion.
-
@marsCubed Well interestingly I did a search on Frank Close and in an article:
Is Cold Fusion Possible?
Experiments in Low-energy Nuclear Reactions Continue
He has been infected by the you know virus.
humanist7117 1 year ago 4
@mattghtpa Edge Science is described as "a 'popular' magazine devoted to heretical/fringe science ideas". It is wise to follow stories for a few years. If something is interesting it does get investigated, it is what most ambitious science graduates do, sometimes for the rest of their lives.
Your position seems blind faith in measurements that do not exist.
Being sceptical, to overcome confirmation bias is at the heart of the scientific method. Accusing science of scepticism seems very foolish.
marsCubed 1 year ago