They both rule. Windows Server 2008 is very stable OS, lighter footprint than its desktop counterpart but just as secure, if not more secure due to the standards of running a enterprise level OS. And Linux is not the media guru or a gamers delight but it just works fine. I work with both personally and I can say they BOTH are a delight. You cannot bash Windows Server 2008 R2 unless you try it.
It wasn't actually finished booting when you logged in :P (Loading cursor)
SOF006 7 months ago
@stealthbird7
They both rule. Windows Server 2008 is very stable OS, lighter footprint than its desktop counterpart but just as secure, if not more secure due to the standards of running a enterprise level OS. And Linux is not the media guru or a gamers delight but it just works fine. I work with both personally and I can say they BOTH are a delight. You cannot bash Windows Server 2008 R2 unless you try it.
win2008workstation 9 months ago
what about over all performance, servers are not made to be turned on and off! does a ssd help with the overall performance....
3r3turn 10 months ago
@stealthbird7 I'm sorry to say this but Redhat is losing the game.
Thetrutv 1 year ago
OMG!
Thetrutv 1 year ago
@stedmen14 first go to crucial and then scan your system, you should see ram you can buy
lisaraybenlisa 1 year ago
ahh windows server :( Linux Rulez :)
stealthbird7 1 year ago
can you send me 2 gigs of memory free
stedmen14 1 year ago