Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

cavalier Z24 vs Mazdaspeed 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
8,517
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 1, 2007

race on foire du camionneur de Barraute

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 8 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (chevyboyz24)

  • why post a video without the trap speeds?

  • cause they dont have trap speed at this track!!

  • lol ya know thats a pretty good reason thats like saying why fart if it doesnt make any noise

  • that doesnt make any noise i know its very bad, but this video as taken with an old fujifilm a210 digital camera, that isn't record noise but the next winter i will buy a new digital camera that will record noise!! ;)

  • dude wtf? i know for a fact that a regular model mazda 3 can take a little z24 cavaqueer...and you mean to tell me this little mofo beat a speedy? HA there's no way...

  • stock speedy vs my modified Z24 yes its true, i have only 230hp but all natural aspiration, no boost lag!! and its only a 1/8 miles drag

see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • mazdaspeed 3 launches are all about the driver. and i'm guessing the cavalier was auto. still pretty sad.

  • dude honestly stfu. people are making it out like i said i was taking corvettes and shit. i never said it was some fucking supercar or anything just that they aren't as slow or as big of pieces of shit as people seem to think they are. unlike everyone else im not gonna talk shit on something ive never seen, or experienced. i know what is decently fast. i own a zx6r ninja that would take most any car in town i definitly wouldn't take on a vett or anything like that.

  • That 3000GT was not Twin Turbo then. Trust me man, I used to drive cars in the Cavalier/Civic/Neon class and think I was fast too. Then I grew up and realized I was actually pretty damn slow.

  • Yes, all 3000GT Turbo's were VR-4 and AWD. The base and SL 3000GT's were not boosted and were heavy and slow. I can tell you right now that you DID NOT beat a turbo 3000GT with a stock Cavalier if he was actually racing you unless his turbo was blown and he was only running on 3 cylinders.

  • of course he had a v6, i would like to hear the car before comment but nyway the mps is one helluva nice car ;) fuck z24 hehe

  • you dont know what that z24 had done to it lol there was no sound that could of been a v6 turbo lol

  • jesus fuck this guy in the mazdaspeed doesn't deserve is car..

  • I agree, I think the civic needs a turbo before it can be considered competitive in its market, it is severely underpowered. And the vr-4 thing, I know, which is why I asked whether or not it was a vr-4 model (which comes stock with twin turbos), or if it was a base 3000gt with aftermarket turbos.

  • the new si's really aren't all they are cracked up to be either. and it also depends on how much gets to the ground and gearing as well. the newest gen si's really still don't have much more power than a stock ecotec cavalier either. the factory rates the ecotec at 140hp but some put out more some less. gm did the same thing with the transam in the late 70's. i dorealise that was a v8 and this is in inline 4. and not all 3000gt turbo's were vr4 awd models.

  • an 02 si I can understand, i thought u were talking 8th gen si, but yeah the 3000gt thing still baffles me, was it a vr-4 or was it the base model with turbos added aftermarket?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more