The Cage-Redux Method for Rubik's Revenge Part 1

Yes I know the colors are not right, its because of my video editor, so just put up with it like I have to, but I am sorry its like that.

If you are having trouble with any of this please ask for help, I have no problems trying to help. try to search through previous questions so that I won't have to answer any twice, thank you. The algorithms used in this portion are below:

R* 2U R'*
L'* 2U L*

U F U' L

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• Rubik
• cube
• 4x4x4
• 5x5x5
• reduction
• cage
• method
• how
• to
• solve
• jonowl
• wsc
• westfield
• state
• college
• revenge
• tutorial
• intuitive
• without
• no
• parity

[btkw]

When did the tutorial start? the introduction was boring so i fast forwarded it but in the end i landed nowher

[Jonowl]

The intro was for the purpose of answering questions that people consistently ask on almost every Rubik's cube vid I've seen. If you had a genuine interest in the Revenge you'd have watched and learned something...

[OsyenVyeter]

Revenge is the best because it is 3 cubes in one, its a 2x, a 3, and a 4, . professor can only be a 5 or a 3.

[Jonowl]

Although I do love the Revenge for its ingenuity, my new personal favorite has become the 6x6 (still waiting for a creative name, I like "khaos cube" after the Greek mythological creation of the gods; this also is a good play on the creator, Greek inventor of v-cubes (Panagiotis Verdes). Though I doubt it is likely to catch on, I'm going to call the 6x6 my khaos cube, because it comes with the 2x2 and 3x3 within, but is more complex than the 4x4 with many more states of parity :D

[kilroy1964]

Gosh, I wish you'd said you're going to start by solving all the centers. It'd saved me 8 minutes of figuring out what you're doing.

[soupofkings]

Yeah, I love my V-Cube 6. It's the worst of the V-Cube series (Mechanically/technically speaking), but awesome in terms of versatility. It simulates a 3x3 much better than any other cube, and a 5x5 fairly well. The 4x4 sims are a bit sloppy on it, but why do a 4x4 when you have a 6x6? =D

[Jonowl]

For finger tricks, using this algorithm is MUCH faster than spinning one side 180 and displacing the centers, especially when you get into the larger cubes (6x6 & 7x7) when constantly displacing the centers becomes time consuming...

[youwusel]

i mean 9:15

[youwusel]

dude, just turn the one layer 180 degrees instead of using such an algo...

turn it round, line the pair up, put it on the top or bottom and fix your centers...

[danedaworld]

how bout a 8x8x8 its omega xD it has 6x6 5x5 4x4 3x3 2x2 (1x1) UBER