How ingenuous. Just like the President's "Change" wasn't what we stupid humans thought it would be? I guess we weren't from the same planet as the President.
-Bizzorro world
Incidentally, Rachel maddow is very transparent and suspect. She can't seem to pull it off when going after the GOP. Perhaps some re-education at Comrad Central is in order.
what was dishonest about the edit, Cahntor has said repeatedly he will NOT compromise on taxes, thats what she was talking about compromise.... the edit of the black guy with AR-15 WAS a dishonest edit, i've rewatched this several times but that WAS what cahntor was saying and HAS said many other times
@benympls What does this have to do with the edit in this video? I don't care about your opinions one way or the other, nor do I care about Rand Paul. I was pointing out the dishonest edit @ 6:15, which is the same dishonest way they edited Rand Paul's comments.
@RichardSFusa (2) cont'd --- you pay attention to the vascular monitoring displays on your floor on Mondays Tuesdays & Wednesday and have lots of action items that flow from the data; & on Thurs, Fri, Sat, you don't even look at them at all but pretend as though "oh yeah I'm monitoring them". Bullshit. By your selective framing in previous posts, you believe deficits suddenly got bad under THIS admin because it's THIS Admin that has the spending prob. If you're going to monitor, do it 7x/week
@dennist3hmenace Then I will apologize for attacks on your ability to advance in our free market system. But to scold me for not refuting your points? I did refute them. I said spending has been too high under every administration and if you like math, you can go to the charts and study them because the numbers are blatant: Deficits consistently have ben greater under Republicans in past 25 years vs Dems, in spite of lockstep preachy dogma. Let me use an analogy you can follow: It's as if
#2 Rand Paul is just a spoiled power hungry fraud, living off the hard work of his daddy. His whole stance on the civil rights NEEDED to be called into question, he didnt mention once in a list of unconstitutional things, he REPEATEDLY brought it up himself OVER & OVER again, writing EDITORIAL letters to newspapers about!
Why didnt he bring up the fact that a standing army in unconstitutional! he didnt write into ANY newspapers about that, picking&choosing shows motives.
Dems do play wedge issues, dream act i'm against is a wedge issue BUT they do NOT edit like the right! AT ALL! Sherrel Sheroid?
And yeah on the issue of tax cuts he said no compromise! just that no compromise! go down the list, THE most use of the filibuster EVER has happened under the R's... its not EVEN close. AT ALL.
And as for Rand Paul, he's a liar jack ass... i respect Ron Paul but rand is no Ron.
I'm neither for Reps or Dems, so I have no dog in this fight because I think they're both the same. But @ 6:15, that was a blatant dishonest edit to make it seem like Cantor was saying "no" to compromise when he was obviously talking about a tax issue. Msnbc did the same edit trick against Rand Paul and his stance on the civil rights bill.
its a cookbook. ITS A COOKBOOOOOOOOOOK!
CorileousBane41 4 months ago
I love that episode!
orbital151 7 months ago
How ingenuous. Just like the President's "Change" wasn't what we stupid humans thought it would be? I guess we weren't from the same planet as the President.
-Bizzorro world
Incidentally, Rachel maddow is very transparent and suspect. She can't seem to pull it off when going after the GOP. Perhaps some re-education at Comrad Central is in order.
Zendout1 1 year ago
@seanboy80
what was dishonest about the edit, Cahntor has said repeatedly he will NOT compromise on taxes, thats what she was talking about compromise.... the edit of the black guy with AR-15 WAS a dishonest edit, i've rewatched this several times but that WAS what cahntor was saying and HAS said many other times
benympls 1 year ago
@benympls What does this have to do with the edit in this video? I don't care about your opinions one way or the other, nor do I care about Rand Paul. I was pointing out the dishonest edit @ 6:15, which is the same dishonest way they edited Rand Paul's comments.
seanboy80 1 year ago
@RichardSFusa (2) cont'd --- you pay attention to the vascular monitoring displays on your floor on Mondays Tuesdays & Wednesday and have lots of action items that flow from the data; & on Thurs, Fri, Sat, you don't even look at them at all but pretend as though "oh yeah I'm monitoring them". Bullshit. By your selective framing in previous posts, you believe deficits suddenly got bad under THIS admin because it's THIS Admin that has the spending prob. If you're going to monitor, do it 7x/week
RichardSFusa 1 year ago
@dennist3hmenace Then I will apologize for attacks on your ability to advance in our free market system. But to scold me for not refuting your points? I did refute them. I said spending has been too high under every administration and if you like math, you can go to the charts and study them because the numbers are blatant: Deficits consistently have ben greater under Republicans in past 25 years vs Dems, in spite of lockstep preachy dogma. Let me use an analogy you can follow: It's as if
RichardSFusa 1 year ago
@seanboy80
#2 Rand Paul is just a spoiled power hungry fraud, living off the hard work of his daddy. His whole stance on the civil rights NEEDED to be called into question, he didnt mention once in a list of unconstitutional things, he REPEATEDLY brought it up himself OVER & OVER again, writing EDITORIAL letters to newspapers about!
Why didnt he bring up the fact that a standing army in unconstitutional! he didnt write into ANY newspapers about that, picking&choosing shows motives.
benympls 1 year ago
@seanboy80
#1
HAhahahaha!
the same!
are F'ing joking!
Dems do play wedge issues, dream act i'm against is a wedge issue BUT they do NOT edit like the right! AT ALL! Sherrel Sheroid?
And yeah on the issue of tax cuts he said no compromise! just that no compromise! go down the list, THE most use of the filibuster EVER has happened under the R's... its not EVEN close. AT ALL.
And as for Rand Paul, he's a liar jack ass... i respect Ron Paul but rand is no Ron.
benympls 1 year ago
I'm neither for Reps or Dems, so I have no dog in this fight because I think they're both the same. But @ 6:15, that was a blatant dishonest edit to make it seem like Cantor was saying "no" to compromise when he was obviously talking about a tax issue. Msnbc did the same edit trick against Rand Paul and his stance on the civil rights bill.
seanboy80 1 year ago