Radiation from WIFI

Wireless Internet has been overlooked,
this is also very bad for Microwave Exposure - and who is chasing down them? How about your Nieghbour - do they broadcast WIFI 100 foot radius and effect your health? Check it out.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• EMF
• wifi
• hotspot
• radiation
• microwave
• effects
• Radio
• Frequency
• antenna
• pain
• wimax
• wi-fi
• cook
• fry
• die
• death
• big
• brother

[vrwc24]

I work in this career field. What he has setup COULD be dangerous depending on the amplitude/frequency of the signal emitted. However, regular WiFi antenna's should pose no health risk. The fact is that your own body emits RF energy. It's everywhere in nature already.

[factsnow]

Most wireless networks operate at a frequency of 2.45 GHz, which means that these transmitters send out radio waves at 2,450,000,000 cycles per second. This is the same frequency at which microwave ovens operate. It turns out that this frequency is ideal for cooking food as it was discovered that 2.45 GHz uniquely excites water molecules to such an extent that it causes them to heat. This is called the thermal effect of radio frequency (RF) radiation. radiationresearch dot org

[dietdictocrat]

i loved the idea of wifi till it made me physically sick! these heartless evil phone companies are radiating are cities with these dangerous wireless technologies, just so coffee slurping, trendy smug 20 somethings get wander around with there oh so stylish apple laptops. this is all going to end in tears!

[gardnerbm]

I cant wait till Im able to get a wife and move out into the country away from guys like this.

[2011so5]

@vrwc24 There are documents that have just recently surfaced proving you are wrong. It's pretty easy to access them. They are located at the magdahavas site under the Dr. Zory Glacer files. Pick of the Week #18: "Effect of Microwaves on the Central Nervous System 1965 – German translation " or "Pick of the Week #12: Why Pulsed Microwave Frequencies are More Harmful."or "Pick of the Week #1: More than 2000 Documents prior to 1972 on Bioeffects of Radio Frequency Radiation" in pdf file form.

[ella5024]

One of these days I'll lock a signal on him and beam him up his rectum like Targeted Individuals deal with everyday.

[flick2040]

70%? Where do you get that from?

The Essex Study found no more than a +-0.1% variation on cognitive ability amongst EHS sufferers and control subjects. 5% is the minimum necessary to not be considered random variation and measurement error.

Were is the 70% figure at? I want to see where it's from if it's true.

[flick2040]

Quote directly from the Essex Study:

"Overall, cognitive functioning was not affected by short-term

exposure to either GSM or UMTS signals in the current study. These findings are consistent with those of Haarala e tal. [2003,2005]; Regeletal. [2006]; Russo

e tal. [2006]; Cineletal. [2008]; Riddervoldetal.

[2008] and Unterlechneretal.[2008]."

[NoRadBlog]

I belive that I can do that, after an exposure of seveal minutes I can feel the source and then I need a day or 2 to revcover.

And there was a test like that with EHS person, it is called the assex study, in which the buttom line was that poeple could not guess right if there was or was not radiation, but a closer look at the data shows that they did guessed it right 70% of the time, even without having time to recover

[flick2040]

Do you believe that if you were presented with ten identical black boxes, all packed full of rocks and hand warmers, except one with a 100mW transmitter at 2.4gHz, that you could tell which is which?

So far, all double blind experiments have failed to demonstrate any ability to detect low power radio, instantly or over prolonged periods.

If you could demonstrate such an ability,you would be very quickly invited into the medical community to help others who suffer under your condition.

[NoRadBlog]

If you don't agree with me, that is fine, you don't have to. Just bear in mind that there are people like me all over the world who suffer from EMR, and lots of people who already got cancer pulled out of their heads shaped like a cell phone antenna.

[NoRadBlog]

It might not have the energy to cause it right away, but after several years of exposure it might and it does. The problem with your approach is that you dismiss what you can't see. And in order to see that EMR can cause cancer you need to look at the microscope for 20 years or more.

[flick2040]

The problem with your argument is that any emission of less than 2.9Ev potential per photon lacks the energy to cause ionization in your body. No amount or length of exposure to Microwaves (each photon has only 0.00001 electron volts) can cause cancer. That would be like saying clapping your hands causes lightning. It just can't happen - no mater how intense or prolonged the trial is. Thousands of animals have lived in saturated chamber and get cancer at the same rate as the radio free rats.