Pocket Wizard Mini and Flex Review | Jefferson Graham
Loading...
Loading...
6,102
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 3:43USA TODAY Talking Tech Meets the Annoying Orangeby talkingtech71 views
- 3:02Talking Your Tech | Christina Hendricksby talkingtech3,891 views
- 2:50Talking Your Tech | Sheryl Sandbergby talkingtech348 views
- 3:25Talking Your Tech | Text vs. E-mailby talkingtech205 views
- 9:19Beginner Strobist - How to get started - What y...by dipmvideos118,203 views
- 7:25Strobist Shoot at Wasing Parkby gregthurtle65,937 views
- 2:39Pocket Wizard Remote Setup For Canonby justinuriahphoto12,356 views
- 5:23Using Wireless TTLby alasmedia13,744 views
- 9:13PocketWizard Flex TT5 Mini TT1 vs. RadioPopper ...by TriCoastPhoto37,982 views
- 1:29AC5 Installationby pocketwizardvids17,638 views
- 9:38PocketWizard Flex TT5 Mini TT1 vs. RadioPopper ...by TriCoastPhoto15,744 views
- 2:06Clay Blackmore with the PocketWizard MiniTT1& F...by pocketwizardvids36,597 views
- 7:17The PocketWizard MiniTT1 and FlexTT5by snapfactory55,291 views
- 1:07MiniTT1 & FlexTT5 - First Look with the Pros: K...by pocketwizardvids26,591 views
- 9:36Fstoppers Nikon Pocket Wizard Flex TT5, Mini TT...by FStoppers36,879 views
- 2:24PocketWizard soft shieldby snapfactory13,091 views
- 7:56PocketWizard Flex TT5 demonstrationby visualreserve31,805 views
- 1:12On Location with PocketWizardby snapfactory57,733 views
- 1:44PocketWizard Nikon Version first prototype testby snapfactory67,156 views
In the studio we use Pocket Wizard all the time. Outside however or even in a large enclosed area such as an airport the MiniTT and Fkex5 simply don't work. The max ETTL range with our 780's is no more than than 10 - 20ft In fact, we get better line of sight coverage using IR. Also. The TT1 uses a battery that is very hard to replace. Even our camera store don't stock them!
TALKCalgary 1 year ago
There's lots of things you don't *need*. In fact most things photographers use they don't need, most are tools that simplify their work. Can you take stunning pictures with a $500 DSLR? Sure, so why do pros spend $1500, $2000, $3000, $7000 etc on great bodies? For all those extra features that make their lives easier, that's why. This is just another tool, one that allows syncing of remote flashes with full TTL, a very useful tool indeed and would pay for itself in time saved very quickly.
jon780 2 years ago
Not all Pros spend that kind of money!
Some just have camera and lens and they create wonders.
I spend way too much, These are little extra things you don't really need to take amazing pictures. I have a whole studio full of equipment but 1 camera, reflector and 1 light and you have yourself enough to do amazing things. I am learning to keep things simple.
Prophit7 2 years ago
Some people don't want to spend their time setting up and tweaking lighting settings. Time is money. Not to mention situations in which you don't have much time or control.
jon780 2 years ago
If it's out of your budget it's probably no for you. $450 for TTL for pros is absolutely nothing. I'm not a pro and I've spent 3 and even 4 times that on a single lens. Pro's spend 10-20 times more than that for camera bodies. $450 is _nothing_ to get this kind of control remotely. Oh and Canon doesn't make these, they're just for Canon cameras.
jon780 2 years ago
:) TTL is just soooo boring...
TOAFN 2 years ago
LoL ok sounds a little slated that way.
Prophit7 2 years ago
Don't know who said that. Wasn't me.
I just like manual. It wasn't a flash attack or something.
TOAFN 2 years ago
Who said I don't know how to use manual control? I have 2 power packs and 3 mono lights that I use a hand held meter. but I'm getting really good at setting up lights on the first shot. I have normal pocket wizards that I bought back when they were just blue but still work to this day. That's why I said so what if its TTL not worth it!
Prophit7 2 years ago
just get cactus remotes and learn to flash with manual settings...
TOAFN 2 years ago