Boeing Sonic Cruiser
Loading...
Loading...
50,842
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 2:00Boeing 747 vs Airbus a380by videomonkey121716,288 views
Featured Video
- 2:54Planes of the Future: 797 A360by Chengsta92149,950 views
- 3:38Why We Don't Have Flying Cars, Yetby MarkProffitt450,551 views
- 2:09airbus a360 ecojet 3d visualisierungby unuebersehbar134,834 views
- 7:02Boeing 797 - Boeing Y3-Ecoliner,Boeing 747-1000...by Underdog2020USA54,417 views
- 3:04NASA Goes Hypersonic - Scram Jetby bry35002,871,219 views
- 0:51Construction of composite fuselage section of a...by enviroaero53,761 views
- 0:05Boeing Supersonic planeby rp4038f3,427 views
- 2:30Sonic Boomby sciencemadefun31,566,433 views
- 1:34SST: Concorde V Boeing 2707 V Lockheed 2000by ConcordeCentral33,971 views
- 1:47(FSX) Boeing-2707 Takeoff From Glasgow Intlby lindsaymobil2217,160 views
- 0:35Boeing 797:Fact or Fiction?by downloadme315,695 views
- 0:36NASA cruise efficient STOL aircraft conceptby theworacle981,467 views
- 0:33Ecoliner Conceptby kaktusdigital37,594 views
- 2:23Boeing Sonic Cruiser - SketchUpby woutboeing30,890 views
- 3:52Boeing vs Airbusby coolbeans70172,764 views
- 3:37Aerion Corporation - Supersonic Business Jetby Unconstant2840,478 views
- 0:29Insane Airplane landing almost crashby Briliantis4,254,333 views
- 6:22Aeronaves do Futuro - Extreme Machines 1by paivinha9513,589 views
- 9:21The Three Supersonic Planes ever made, Flying i...by TheMayor500075,910 views
@AviationEnthusiastic The tires burst often. = unsafe.
zszs100 5 days ago
CONCORDE OWNED (and still owns actually).
AviationEnthusiastic 1 week ago
@zszs100 "Concorde was unsafe" - ignorant.
AviationEnthusiastic 1 week ago
Damn, look at that sexiness! Too bad it was cancelled :(
RusskieHunter13 3 weeks ago
@matchbox555 First of all they build the 787 instead of this plane. Second, the concord was very fast (twice the speed of sound) but it was unsafe.
zszs100 2 months ago
@itsmegp46 Can't tell if stupid or trolling... If running over that debris didn't bring down the Concorde, then what did?
And it should also be noted that there were only 20 Concordes in service for only 27 years, so statistically speaking one catastrophic event in that time is actually a pretty bad accident rate.
Brad1711 2 months ago
@matchbox555 First, we did have it, for thirty years. It was too expensive and too noisy. Second, the reason the sonic cruiser development was abandoned as I mentioned earlier was because the airlines favored slower, more fuel effcient planes over faster ones. There is no point in bulding a plane that no one will buy, is there? Finally, until someone finds a way to eliminate the sonic boom associated with super sonic planes, again, no one will buy them.
starladear002 3 months ago
@itsmegp46 so its not even going to be built.. even worse then
we will have to hope the chinese develop super fast flight.. someone needs to
matchbox555 3 months ago
@Brad1711 Running over a piece of debris is not what brought down the Concorde. That debris was heavy and hard enough that it hit the fuel tank and ruptured it causing the fire. It should be noted that during nearly three decades of commercial flight, this was Concordes only fatal crash.
itsmegp46 3 months ago
@matchbox555 First, this design was abandoned nine years ago, due to non interest. Airliners favored slower more fuel efficient planes. While this plane would have flown slower than a Concorde, it would have flown 15-20% faster than any current commercial jet flown today. Its chief advantage over the Concorde was no sonic boom.
itsmegp46 3 months ago