Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Exploring Inertial Propulsion Using Gyroscopic Motion

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
108,171
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 21, 2007

info: http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/SmartSPIN_X2/SmartSPIN_X2.htm

We are told by the scientific establishment we live in a universe governed by Newtonian mechanics.

NEWTON'S THIRD LAW: For every action, there's an equal and opposition reaction.

So, according to Georgia State University hyperphysics website:

"... All forces in the universe occur in equal but oppositely directed pairs. There are no isolated forces; for every external force that acts on an object there is a force of equal magnitude but opposite direction which acts back on the object which exerted that external force. In the case of internal forces, a force on one part of a system will be countered by a reaction force on another part of the system so that an isolated system cannot by any means exert a net force on the system as a whole. A system cannot "bootstrap" itself into motion with purely internal forces - to achieve a net force and an acceleration, it must interact with an object external to itself. ..."

But is this true? Are we being told the truth? What would break the symmetry of oppositely directed pairs of forces? How would we do it? The correct answer is given a closed system that exhibits an imbalance of internal isolated forces in three dimensional space, the same system exhibits a balance of forces in four dimensional space.

Could it be that the opposing reacting force component is directed as a torque or moment producing a torsion field that acts antigravitationally? Is the torsion field effect caused by a change in angular momentum, or a change in the spin of fundamental particles? How does this affect the inertia of a closed system? Is a change in inertia a change in mass? How does this affect the effect of Special Relativity?


EXPERIMENT CONCLUSION:

A MAJOR discovery no doubt.

STATIC WEIGHT: 18.5 lbs.
WEIGHT RUNNING: 18 lbs.

Close examination of the video above shows ONLY a loss of weight that occurred when the X2 was operated. At NO time during this operation did the scale indicate an increase in weight, a weight above its static weight of 18.5 lbs. I suspect this is a violation of Newton's Third Law of equal and opposite forces, and that an imbalance of forces exists. The forces are finally brought into balance through a torsion or moment effect, a torsion field effect, if you will. This torsion effect is directed antigravitationally, or acts against the force of gravity, resulting in a loss of weight. This loss, I believe, is due to the opposing spin of the gyroscopic rotors, a quantum entanglement of rotors, leading to a decrease in inertia of the spinning system. This effect is further "amplified" by rotating the entire assembly.

  • likes, 43 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (sirHOAX)

  • There's nothing about your conclusions that are correct. Also, quantum entanglement, really? Try a little harder. That statement doesn't even make sense. Quantum entanglement is.. For thought experiment purposes, imagine two atoms. One has a chance to decay after a certain time, which will affect with 100% certainty the atom next to it. If we see that the first atom has decayed, then that means the second atom MUST be in the corresponding state.

  • @sweetbrains Don't get so excited.

  • Fact of the matter is you can direct energy or force provided in a gyroscopic pattern to create balanced forces that while spinning at extremely high speed are balanced or otherwise lighter. Turn/slow/jurk/or otherwise knock out of equilibrium and it will be hell fire which ever direction you see fit. Not necessarily up tho, this thing might still need a reasonable fuel source.

  • @sirHOAX Even small prop driven, even motorcycle engine for RPM?

see all

All Comments (279)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I like the sound, it's elevating.

  • @Edwardbwalti It is a Gyroscope.

  • What was spinning inside the device

  • You may have something here. This is something I don't understand, but you went to a heck of a lot of trouble to make this thing. There are other way to produce a closed system, however seems to be ....I have heard of this method before. Why not write a paper on this thing?

  • Sounds great! Looks nice too!)

  • Your half way there-- it sure SOUNDS like a UFO =)

  • @trx125tracy69 this one was,becouse common sense told me before it started up that 4 motors running inside an object while it turned was going to do nothing,sorry,yes experiment's are worth the time,but it has got to be something more of a challenge,like heating up a chemical,or substance while turning,or earth magnets,turning while spining,all that was going to do is run and spin like a washing machine.

  • @getsafe1212

    maybe ride it on very precise bearings so that the wobble does not effect the measurement as well

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more