@yashil17 Than you know wrong my friend :-) studies have proven that Turks are 75% native Anatolian people + ~17% Central Asian Iranic + 8 East Asian genes. actually Turks of Anatolia have just a bit more East Asian genes than Iranians. Kurds on the other hand have considerable lower East Asian(mongol) Genes than Turks as well Iranians.
... i know. u say that Turks have a Kurdish look but Kurds don't have a Turkish look, how does that work. i.e. how would the Turks have a Kurd look in the first place? they would have to mix, its not like Kurds could just somehow "pass" their feautres/traites without recieving the other's traites, hence "mixing"
ok i agree with u that accent and loanwords are different, but for Kurds which is it - accents or loanwords? i think its loanwords since they have many Arabic/ Turkish words depending on their place, so if they do have loanwords it would forcely affect the accent of the language, compare the Kurds of Syria or Arab nations to the Kurds of Eran, it sounds different. i don't know why you are so into proving to me that Kurds have less Arabic influence in their language than Eranians...
@yashil17 Please read my comments again and better. Accent is one thing loanwords another. You can ask whatever linguist you want they will all tell you that Farsi has much more Arabic loanwords than Kurdish. There is no "turkish look" on Kurds there is a Kurdish look on Turks. the large majority of Turks are native Anatolian peoples. The Northern Syrians especially Druze Christians are genetically descend from Caucasians and Greeks.
i meant mixes and influences with the non-Airiyan peoples. but Kurds have many influences on them from Iraqis and Syrians, Turks - look at their language/accent, music, and even their physical features. and Kurds
ok i see what u maen, like Kurds are essentially from Saga, like the Punjabs and how they are Saga. but the fact is that the Saga were of Eranic origin and the Eranic people constitute of modern Kurds, Tajiks, Uzbeks, Afghans, Azeris, Ossets, and many more but they would all be calledd "Eran-e" not the present day Eranians but the ancient Airiyans ( similarly the Turkic peoples vs the Turkish people). Hence the Saga would be Kurd, Tajik, Erani, etc.
Love Iran! Long Live Iran!
bs0373 1 week ago
I lol'd so hard at 0:46 when that oldie starts shuffling across the screen with a vase with a candle inside on her head.
thunderflash82 2 weeks ago
@yashil17 Than you know wrong my friend :-) studies have proven that Turks are 75% native Anatolian people + ~17% Central Asian Iranic + 8 East Asian genes. actually Turks of Anatolia have just a bit more East Asian genes than Iranians. Kurds on the other hand have considerable lower East Asian(mongol) Genes than Turks as well Iranians.
dataman121 4 weeks ago
@dataman121
...i thought and know very well that Turks of Turkey are originally Mongols who mixed with the Anatolians peoples, but u say differently?
yashil17 1 month ago
@dataman121
... i know. u say that Turks have a Kurdish look but Kurds don't have a Turkish look, how does that work. i.e. how would the Turks have a Kurd look in the first place? they would have to mix, its not like Kurds could just somehow "pass" their feautres/traites without recieving the other's traites, hence "mixing"
yashil17 1 month ago
@dataman121
ok i agree with u that accent and loanwords are different, but for Kurds which is it - accents or loanwords? i think its loanwords since they have many Arabic/ Turkish words depending on their place, so if they do have loanwords it would forcely affect the accent of the language, compare the Kurds of Syria or Arab nations to the Kurds of Eran, it sounds different. i don't know why you are so into proving to me that Kurds have less Arabic influence in their language than Eranians...
yashil17 1 month ago
@yashil17 Please read my comments again and better. Accent is one thing loanwords another. You can ask whatever linguist you want they will all tell you that Farsi has much more Arabic loanwords than Kurdish. There is no "turkish look" on Kurds there is a Kurdish look on Turks. the large majority of Turks are native Anatolian peoples. The Northern Syrians especially Druze Christians are genetically descend from Caucasians and Greeks.
dataman121 1 month ago
@dataman121
i meant mixes and influences with the non-Airiyan peoples. but Kurds have many influences on them from Iraqis and Syrians, Turks - look at their language/accent, music, and even their physical features. and Kurds
yashil17 1 month ago
@dataman121
ok i see what u maen, like Kurds are essentially from Saga, like the Punjabs and how they are Saga. but the fact is that the Saga were of Eranic origin and the Eranic people constitute of modern Kurds, Tajiks, Uzbeks, Afghans, Azeris, Ossets, and many more but they would all be calledd "Eran-e" not the present day Eranians but the ancient Airiyans ( similarly the Turkic peoples vs the Turkish people). Hence the Saga would be Kurd, Tajik, Erani, etc.
yashil17 1 month ago
Is this Persian Hooters?
mashtee2003 1 month ago