2007 Civic Si Turbo vs 2005 Civic Si N/A
Top Comments
All Comments (119)
-
Nice
-
BUSSES lol
-
@Mariolude I understand what you are trying to say,but if the other car companies decided not to put turbos on their car, they would just tune them up differently to add more power. It all comes down to what the company is aiming for,some people rather have some good low torque an response on their car than having to go very high on their rpms to get power, and that's when a turbo charger comes on top. So it's about preference, it doesn't mean that other engines suck just because they use turbos
-
freio está bem do civic asp!!
-
yeah My turbo RSX is almost 300hp at the crank. I have another RSX I am selling but it has jsut the K20A3 with 160hp, that like a 140hp gap
-
@kmking40 no no vids cuz i was driving haha im too safe to record while i race =)
-
@kmking40 exactly
-
@sanohoang duh. lol
-
@DJP444 yes very fun, thanks
so just a curiosity but you said FWD and power= fail, if its fail then why do civics beat mustangs, vipers, camaros, etc? and why call a civic a ricer when people just like to have fun with them? why cant they just be modded cars?
sanohoang 1 year ago 5
@Mariolude /agreed. I love how, Cobalt SS's and GTi's are in the Civic si's class and the civic is N/A.
MroAeon 7 months ago