Thorium CERN LHC Peak Oil
Top Comments
All Comments (77)
-
we are not over populated, come here:
truthknowledge. com
I'm exposing the strategy to manipulate your mind! For it's far more important to expose the game than it is to simply expose those responsible, the players or puppets. Welcome to the REAL world.
Join me on Facebook
When millions lock in that pyramid will flip upside down.
My Religion is the Religion of Reality, Religion of Critical Thinking, Religion of Humanity, Religion of Liberty, Religion of Truth.
-
The LHC comments had you on shaky ground, but the teleportation thing is mental hospital talk.
-
Yummy that's one tasty looking chicken! LUNCH TIME !
-
I understand that you argue from an agenda: you oppose oil & have a fanatical, unrealistic pseudo-science belief that borders on religion, that carbon energy is destroying the planet's fragile atmosphere. You have a difficult time observing and thinking objectively at the issue. You WANT OIL TO BE DEAD. You would hate nothing more than for Peak oil to be true, or at least have everyone believe it is true, to kill oil energy. The Truth has no agenda. Peak oil is a lie. Time will prove it.
-
@shellius I have given up wondering why it is that leftist's debate tactics always devolve into an attempt to demean & ridicule those of an opposing view. (Elves / gnomes are more likely to be the fantasy of a leftist). You say I have a silly theory, and claim it is science that oil is the residue of dead fauna and such. That actually IS a THEORY, lady. Not fact. Yes I know that it is the prevailing theory to date, which is humorous to me: billions of gallons from dead dinos and trees? LMAO
-
@myopicseer By the way, my statement that oil is a fossil fuel that does not magically replenish itself due to myterious internal processes (elves? Gnomes?) based on "pressure" (what a silly theory) is SCIENCE, not opinion. If you seriously believe that "coalescing" elements magically create oil, you need to take some basic energy science courses. No school on earth teaches the BS you claim.
-
@shellius WRONG. Oil is a fossil fuel. It's literally made of fossils that can be seen under a microscope. It's well-established science. Your claim is BS propaganda and NOT based on science. Oil is made of stuff that is millions of years old, and when it's gone, it's gone. It'll be completely gone in 100 years or less if we continue to burn it, which is also a huge problem because it's adding to climate change. BTW, not even the oil companies agree with your little theory.
-
@shellius Thanks for your opinion. Mine remains firm, however. I base my opinion on as much fact that underlies the concept of peak oil. Oil wells have, and do refill. Oil is not a "Fossil Fuel". Oil is produced by internal processes deep within the earth, based upon pressure, solar particles, temperature and a coalescing of elements, it would appear. Simply saying that oil does not replenish, really provides no more persuasion than me saying it does. Deep wells do refill = fact.
-
@myopicseer Oil wells do not refill. Once the oil is gone, it's gone. Peak oil refers to the end of easy oil production due to the fact that all the easy to get oil has run out. We hit Peak Oil years ago. All the easy oil is gone and it will stay gone because oil is finite and we have nearly used it up. People who tell you oil replenishes or wells "fill up" are lying to you. It's never happened and it never will happen.
-
..(cont) and that the conventional wells could "dry up", because they were filled at one point in earth's geological history by the deeper source, and perhaps (due to geological forces such as tectonics) were isolated from the source as a limited pocket of exhaustible fuel (a finite "reserve" of oil). And this is where Peak Oil came into thinking. There are strange cases of oil wells "refilling"...this fact, in part, supports the regenerative theory.
You are wrong about Peak Oil.
Peak oil is not related to consumption. Peak oil is simply a bell curve of how much oil can be extracted from the earth in a given amount of time... as wells diminish, we pump less oil out of them, despite putting the same, or more effort into pumping it. It is simply a chart demonstrating the diminishing returns we will get from the money and energy we put into pumping oil from the earth. Again, it has nothing to do with our consumption of the oil we extract.
3Z3VH 1 year ago 11
I think I would rather the chicken speak.
judoyodan 1 year ago 6