Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Creative Processes in Science and Technology: Insights from

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
9,398
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 8, 2009

Google Tech Talk
May 14, 2009

ABSTRACT

Creative Processes in Science and Technology: Insights from Visual Arts. Presented by Dr. Julio M. Ottino.

Creativity is essential in art, in science, and in technology. But in what way is creativity different in these three areas, and in what way is it similar? Technology is about invention, making and building; science is about unveiling, revealing what may already be there. Philosophers, placing the emphasis on uniqueness, have declared that science is ephemeral and that art is permanent, and have placed artistic creation on the highest plane. Others have taken the same viewpoint. However, is this actually true? Or more pragmatically, are there creative processes and lessons that can be transferred across domains? In what ways do the domains intersect and enrich each other? Julio M. Ottino argues that artistic creativity reveals processes that hold lessons for scientific and technological creativity.

Dr. Julio M. Ottino is the dean of the Robert R. McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Sciences at Northwestern University where he holds the titles of Distinguished Robert R. McCormick Institute Professor and Walter P. Murphy Professor of Chemical and Biological Engineering. Born in Argentina he had a career as an artist before he moved to the U.S. for his PhD in Chemical Engineering at the University of Minnesota. He then held a faculty position at UMass/Amherst and held chaired and senior appointments at Caltech, Stanford, and the University of Minnesota. He joined Northwestern in 1991 and was chairman of the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering from 1992 to 2000. He was the founder and co-director of the Northwestern Institute on Complex Systems.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • I wouldn't agree that science is five hundred years old. Though it was labeled/discovered around that time, the scientific methodology is natural to the human mind and the process of "scientific discovery" is as old as man itself.

  • Ahh, got to love these Google tech talks, a great way of informing yourself! Thank you google. =)

see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what a bunch of crap while overstating the obvious...might as well give us a scientific explanation on how a lawn mower works..

  • I liked all the examples but found the methodology on how to find differences and similarities between art, technology and science cumbersome. It is far easier from a more philosophical perspective: art (subject-relations), technology (inter-subjective) and science (subject-object relations) - which is far more concise. The parameters (growth mode, support structure...) are still fairly arbitrary.. so the revelations at the end are fairly general too and offer no new coherent concept

  • No wonder it clings to the "Sinful Nature."

    Its a horrible decision to rely on:Humans...

  • A fascinating cognitive dance...

  • Very good talk! Have had my thoughts on this aswell but he made it all much clearer. Thanks!

  • Awesome Thanks! :-)!

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more