(#3) The "Not" & Kinds of Communication (Gregory Bateson)

READ: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0982755953/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=c...
Cf http://www.highbeam.com/Search.aspx?q=author:%22Anton%2c+Corey%22 This is the third and final part of a discussion taken from my essay in The American Journal of Semiotics Vol 19 (1-4). Special Issue on Gregory Bateson. Guest edited by Deborah Eicher-Catt.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Gregory Bateson
• Analog Communication
• Digital Communication
• Logical Types
• Language
• Speech
• Paradoxes
• Play

[DadsBlueAngel]

I wonder how Bateson use these ideas, as he developed them, to look back on and analyse the Japanese atrocities in China. For example an interaction between an aristocrat and a lower being was to toy, not interact or relate.

[anujdasgupta]

besides we wud have, if we had the choice of not to do so?

[anujdasgupta]

and r "we" obeying the rule or is it more so obeyed, just obeyed?

[anujdasgupta]

So phantasy wud have been impossible without the Digital?

[anujdasgupta]

Do i see a certain Hegel at 2.25?

[robbwindow]

Being able to distinguish between reality and fantasy within the syntax of writing and speech when automated challenges like a monkey are subconsciously challenging words, meaning and sounds it shows, leads to misinterpretation however is not just monkey behaviour it is in my poetry a challenge of facing and learning the hard way semantics. This needs to change. Thanks Batesman and Your explanation every-time I can loose interpretation and train of thought during speech and academic writing.

[jogayot]

yeah, thanks for your perspective... here is my piece of "cookie" for your effort ;) view_play_list?p=8AF68122EF306­50C

[dospook]

for what it is worth I find your videos very very meaningful to me. I appreciate your expression