MIR: Settlement Freeze - Been There, Done That

(Mosaic Intelligence Report: August 28, 2009) The Obama administration hopes to announce a resumption of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks. But Israel's ever-expanding network of settlements seems to stand in the way. Will a new push for settlement-freeze succeed? Or will Netanyahu's delay tactics prevail?
Stay updated on Twitter
http://www.twitter.com/jamaldajani

For more info, visit us at http://www.linktv.org/mir.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Mir
• Linktv
• Mosaic
• Jamal Dajani
• Benjamin Netanyahu
• George MItchell
• Israel
• Israeli Settlements
• Israeli-Palestinian

[jad114c]

The French use the proper term colonists for settlers.

[roberteckerson]

Here's a novel idea. No more US money for Israel. Or Egypt, or anyone else for that matter. Let's be like Switzerland, neutral.

[Prunesqualer]

These settlements are in violation of international law:

The Geneva Convention (IV) Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, August 12, 1949:

Section III, Article 49:

"The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies."

Why isn't the UN called in to enforce the law and close these illegal settlements?.

[abbienetvision]

rich,

What about the ethnic cleansing in almost all Muslim countries? Gaza is ethnically cleansed of Jews, while Israel has a large Arab Muslim population.

[abbienetvision]

richard,

Did you bother to even look at vista's home page to see who he is? Please look and see that you are speaking to someone that knows nothing but pedophilia and watching young girls strip.

[vistavision2]

ADD addiotnal 2.1 Trillion for INTERNAL Security debt

So 4.2 TRILLION in US debt because no other country is going to give USA free monies like Israel recieves to fund it Crimes Against Humanity in OCC UNGA 181 State of Palestine.

100% of that expenditure is ZERO investment but simple maintenance of security.

ADD the Reserach & development expenditures for technolog.

NOW why we are to our ears in DEBT!

PS. 911 cost about one billion in damages per hijacker.

[vistavision2]

Richard,

Americans of latino descent at present are 30% of USA military grunt forces and are only 10% population.

NATO could only deploy 30k troops to Afghanistan: Militarily a JOKE!!!

American zionists got played by Israeli zionists to protect Israeli interestes at the expense of American Interests

Israel 6 million pop expends 6 Billion in Gifted USA monies or 1k per citizen ADDITIONAL 300 Billion USD for USA EXTERNAL security X 7 years= 2.1 Trillion debt

[Richardcuz420]

1st. UBL is not an Arab leader.

2. What is your point? You are correct 100 percent but what is the point behind these facts?

[vistavision2]

Richard, I'm American.

Wars of attrition are won in the bedroom and lost in the battlefield.

While everyoen busy trying to import the entire population of Russian pretenders of Jews into Israel & occupied Palestine; Europe & USA white population is IMPLODING exponentially.

China is not the only one in the 4 granparents+2 parents= 1 child population.

Twenty year window: Blacks & Latinos do not take kindly to opression nor repression as they have been the victims

[vistavision2]

UN Charter mandates:

Art 41 Sanctions

Art 42 Force Compliance

Art 103 "In the event of a conflict between the obligations of the Members of the United Nations under the present Charter and their obligations under any other international agreements their obligations under the present Charter *SHALL PREVAIL"

UNGA 181 is a Art 80 Terms Resolution with no exception clause.

UNGA 273 Israeli leadership entered the State of Israel into the UN Charter Treaty

[Richardcuz420]

Your point?

And yes I am still laughing, because you are very ignorant.  911 was an act against America and now look at your countries! WE LIT UP YOUR WORLD BABY! 3,000 dead Americans Vs over 1 million Iraqis! How did UBL benefit you again?

BTW what country are you living in now Vistavision2?

[vistavision2]

UNGA 181 Part I., A. [Ph 8.] "(c) The Security Council determine as a threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of aggression in accordancw with Article 39 of the Charter, any attempt to alter the resolution envisaged by this [Art 80] resolution.

Rhodes Conference where Armistice Innternational Instruments of Agreement between parties & UN

UNSC 72, PH 2.,: Art 39 "threat to the peace"

UNSC 242: Art 39 "breach of the peace" Resolution

UNSC1397: UNC Art 39 "Act of aggression"