David Robertson on "Richard Dawkins vs William Lane Craig" [mirror]
Top Comments
All Comments (7)
-
Damn it!!
-
People who will not debate others, does not mean it's favorable for the person who wants to.
William Lane Craig is a member of the Discovery institute, which is directly related to creationism. Craig is not a creationist? He does not believe in macro evolution, which means he does not believe in accepted peer reviewed evolutionary biology, he is a creationist of the worst kind. The empty chair tactic did not work on anybody, and I know that upsets many theists, it was childish, unprofessional.
-
Even the slogan "there's probably no God, so stop worrying and enjoy life" is so wrong that who ever wrote it clearly has no idea what it actually means to believe in God. I am a believer, but far from being worried, I have less of a reason to worry as even death is not the end. And I also enjoy life to the full not despite my faith, but because of it. To paraphrase an old saying, my life is Gods gift to me, what I do with it is my gift to God.
-
The Pope against Dawkins in a debate would be awesome to see lol
-
No point in giving tips to someone who appears too afraid to show up.
I'm surprised people are so reluctant to debate Craig. I would rather debate him than most people just because Craig's presentations are so clear. It's not a struggle to understand what he's arguing, and it's easy to take notes. Most people ramble incoherently, but Craig is very organized.
philochristos 4 months ago 6
Why did you put up a picture of Ben Stiller when you were quoting Harris? Just kidding -- great video!
=)
1GodOnlyOne 4 months ago 4