The Spaceship of the future is here

All rights reserved to DW TV. The space ship of the future is here

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Space ship
• the future of space
• NASA
• ESA
• space agency
• research
• hi tech space ship
• layer
• atmosphere
• DW tv
• mars
• mission mars
• science
• curious
• everyday question
• tomorrow today
• physics
• biology
• bio
• speedlight
• engineering
• bio mechanics
• funny Einstein
• e=mc
• unknown question
• unknown answer
• interesting question
• sleep walk
• sports
• walk
• human body
• body balance
• starwarp
• space system travel
• gliese
• mass trusters

[andrewfink1]

@borntolose1970 no money moron..are fucking govswould rather spend it on military tech

[pureawesomeness2012]

@borntolose1970 well they need funding from the frucking government, dont they? BUT NO! let us give money to the idiots at wall street!

[andrewfink1]

@panjak42 No about half of our budget is spent on the military...if we combined the worlds militray budget the usa would pay for roughly half..about 1 trillion if you include the wars and paying dictators"bribing" to be on our side relative to that social security and medicare...science gets a pinprick of the cash flow and of that nasa gets a small amount..plus congress tells them which rockets to build*more expensive_and which programs to explore and they arnt exactly rocket scientists

[zataflex]

@andrewfink1 Much more on helping people to get used to be lazy.

[panjak42]

@andrewfink1 Don't you mean food stamps?

[melis256]

@akashashen -[bck from sleep]

On A) Well they are definitely tying it very closely together in the Fermionic condensate article, and the same with superfluid Helium 4.

On B) Got it from here: AgyAFElQZcU

don't ask me why he explain it as he does but his experiments seem to go further than what we have talked about. As he states that the superconductors are only good since it is easier to model on and experiment with.

[akashashen]

@melis256 Regarding A) show me where you think there's any claim in wikipedia or other resource where superconductors are BECs. Electrons would not flow over their surface if they were BECs; that's acting as two separate particles, not one.

Polarizes space: Explain what you intend to mean, because that has no physics concept; you can't polarize the surface of the Universe. If you could, you'd risk creating a lower-energy vacuum, which would alter the whole Universe once nucleated.

[melis256]

@akashashen

May I then ask, have you seen that interview with Dr. Podkletnov from 2004?

Well if you haven't I can provide a link, but anyway I went and watched it through and he explains quite a bit about how his gravity modification should work and somewhere around the middle of the vid he comes out with something about that the sup-cons and the BEC are not the important part but the fact that it polarizes space and that can be done with conventional materials.

[melis256]

@akashashen to A)

uuuuuummm....' Ya.. I have absolutely no comment on that.

You should talk to your professor about rewriting/adding to sources of knowledge about the subject on the Internet if you feel something needs to be changed/clarified. Wikipedia would be a good place to start a little crusade.

[akashashen]

@melis256 Sorry if that seemed weirdly broken up, but YT's been doing some weird math with character counts. If I hit reply, I got 190 characters, and three letters later, I'd have 176 characters. I don't know why they're putting me on Beta or if there's a system wide BS glitch, but I hope it wasn't too hard to follow.

[akashashen]

@melis256 B finally done) At that point, you're making a field which has the same effect as diamagnetism, but without the negative effects of magnetism itself, such as lifting your body by the soft tissues which end up support your bones, but gets yanked back down by your fillings, pins in your limbs, et c. Without Higgs boson based technology, we still have no means of producing this effect.