Being it is obvious that you don't want your predetermined views to be challenged, my advice it to stick to big corporate media, that way you can constantly have your ignorance regurgitated back to you at all times.
Gatekeepers are only effective if they can maintain the trust of those they are blocking. Ms. Goodman panics because she cannot allow herself to view evidence. If she were shown evidence, she could no longer feign ignorance of it. So merely by showing her the network aired 2nd plane, whose nose exits the other side of the WTC intact, she would no longer be useful as a gatekeeper to her employers. She avoids evidence because it would end her current career. Controlled opposition.
the reason, thank goodness, she doesn't believe the evidence-free conspiracy theory is that it lacks evidence... when two massive sky-scrapers come down with two massive airplanes, it's not a surprise, to those who value evidence, that a building very close by would catch some debris & be destroyed as a result. Evidence is important.
don't you think the whole 911 thing really supports the statement "its not seeing is believing, its believing is seeing" if you believe the mainstream news would never lie to you about such a massively important event; that enables you to see 3 towers collapse in their own footprint at a speed close to freefall and not believe that carefully laid out explosives did it. It's astonishing how easy people are manipulated.
@MrBlinkmiss I agree, this also goes up for Howard Zinn (R.I.P.)and Noam Chomsky. They resisted to give their opinion about 9/11, but in their hearts they also knew and know that this tragedy has left us with way too many questions and controversies. Let's get an investigation started with "lucky" Larry Silverstein? He's the biggest person of interest in this whole case! Remember the sudden collapse of building 7, that's how it all started........
@sponsoredwalk1 i think they should leave her alone to a degree, i think she probably does think its an inside job, but shes being realistic, and not coming out and saying her opinion because she would instantly be tarred and feathered by the mainstream media. I agree with what shes doing, lets be fucking effective.
i can't stand the arrogant certainty of 911 truther's who KNOW that 911 was an inside job with more certainty than physicists have of gravity existing...
Why don't these gatekeepers of the cult get out onto the streets protesting & demanding to see the 100+ pentagon camera's instead of attacking left wing media personalities whose reporting/books have only taught people.
It's pathetic going up to these people with camera's @ book signings, forcefully asking "do you believe?" like some religion
LMAO!!! \/\/\/\/
BillDaBurgerEater 3 weeks ago
@brahmbhattbhavna
Being it is obvious that you don't want your predetermined views to be challenged, my advice it to stick to big corporate media, that way you can constantly have your ignorance regurgitated back to you at all times.
Yoseman1 4 months ago
Avoiding the evidence is the trademark of a fake.
StratusBlue 8 months ago
Gatekeepers are only effective if they can maintain the trust of those they are blocking. Ms. Goodman panics because she cannot allow herself to view evidence. If she were shown evidence, she could no longer feign ignorance of it. So merely by showing her the network aired 2nd plane, whose nose exits the other side of the WTC intact, she would no longer be useful as a gatekeeper to her employers. She avoids evidence because it would end her current career. Controlled opposition.
StratusBlue 8 months ago
the reason, thank goodness, she doesn't believe the evidence-free conspiracy theory is that it lacks evidence... when two massive sky-scrapers come down with two massive airplanes, it's not a surprise, to those who value evidence, that a building very close by would catch some debris & be destroyed as a result. Evidence is important.
tobynsaunders 9 months ago
Amy Goodman is a whore
brahmbhattbhavna 10 months ago
don't you think the whole 911 thing really supports the statement "its not seeing is believing, its believing is seeing" if you believe the mainstream news would never lie to you about such a massively important event; that enables you to see 3 towers collapse in their own footprint at a speed close to freefall and not believe that carefully laid out explosives did it. It's astonishing how easy people are manipulated.
MrBlinkmiss 1 year ago
@MrBlinkmiss I agree, this also goes up for Howard Zinn (R.I.P.)and Noam Chomsky. They resisted to give their opinion about 9/11, but in their hearts they also knew and know that this tragedy has left us with way too many questions and controversies. Let's get an investigation started with "lucky" Larry Silverstein? He's the biggest person of interest in this whole case! Remember the sudden collapse of building 7, that's how it all started........
josgvis 1 year ago
@sponsoredwalk1 i think they should leave her alone to a degree, i think she probably does think its an inside job, but shes being realistic, and not coming out and saying her opinion because she would instantly be tarred and feathered by the mainstream media. I agree with what shes doing, lets be fucking effective.
MrBlinkmiss 1 year ago
i can't stand the arrogant certainty of 911 truther's who KNOW that 911 was an inside job with more certainty than physicists have of gravity existing...
Why don't these gatekeepers of the cult get out onto the streets protesting & demanding to see the 100+ pentagon camera's instead of attacking left wing media personalities whose reporting/books have only taught people.
It's pathetic going up to these people with camera's @ book signings, forcefully asking "do you believe?" like some religion
sponsoredwalk1 1 year ago 2