Philly 9/11 Truth speaks with Amy Goodman

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,235
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 19, 2008

Amy Goodman is asked what steps she is taking to support a new inquiry into 9/11 and the case of Sibel Edmonds.

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LMAO!!! \/\/\/\/

  • @brahmbhattbhavna

    Being it is obvious that you don't want your predetermined views to be challenged, my advice it to stick to big corporate media, that way you can constantly have your ignorance regurgitated back to you at all times.

  • Avoiding the evidence is the trademark of a fake.

  • Gatekeepers are only effective if they can maintain the trust of those they are blocking. Ms. Goodman panics because she cannot allow herself to view evidence. If she were shown evidence, she could no longer feign ignorance of it. So merely by showing her the network aired 2nd plane, whose nose exits the other side of the WTC intact, she would no longer be useful as a gatekeeper to her employers. She avoids evidence because it would end her current career. Controlled opposition.

  • the reason, thank goodness, she doesn't believe the evidence-free conspiracy theory is that it lacks evidence... when two massive sky-scrapers come down with two massive airplanes, it's not a surprise, to those who value evidence, that a building very close by would catch some debris & be destroyed as a result. Evidence is important.

  • Amy Goodman is a whore

  • don't you think the whole 911 thing really supports the statement "its not seeing is believing, its believing is seeing" if you believe the mainstream news would never lie to you about such a massively important event; that enables you to see 3 towers collapse in their own footprint at a speed close to freefall and not believe that carefully laid out explosives did it. It's astonishing how easy people are manipulated.

  • @MrBlinkmiss I agree, this also goes up for Howard Zinn (R.I.P.)and Noam Chomsky. They resisted to give their opinion about 9/11, but in their hearts they also knew and know that this tragedy has left us with way too many questions and controversies. Let's get an investigation started with "lucky" Larry Silverstein? He's the biggest person of interest in this whole case! Remember the sudden collapse of building 7, that's how it all started........

  • @sponsoredwalk1 i think they should leave her alone to a degree, i think she probably does think its an inside job, but shes being realistic, and not coming out and saying her opinion because she would instantly be tarred and feathered by the mainstream media. I agree with what shes doing, lets be fucking effective.

  • i can't stand the arrogant certainty of 911 truther's who KNOW that 911 was an inside job with more certainty than physicists have of gravity existing...

    Why don't these gatekeepers of the cult get out onto the streets protesting & demanding to see the 100+ pentagon camera's instead of attacking left wing media personalities whose reporting/books have only taught people.

    It's pathetic going up to these people with camera's @ book signings, forcefully asking "do you believe?" like some religion

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more