A Counter-Feminist Theory of the State

A transcript of this talk can be found here:

http://www.4shared.com/document/FlctSAFM/_2__CFtheoryOfState.html?

The anti-male nature of the state voids any social contract binding upon men. Feminism has no ground of moral authority. You have no political obligation toward women, and your transaction with any individual woman is based on a moral law within yourself.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Counter
• Feminist
• Theory
• of
• the
• State

[kurtbirk]

Fidelbogen, Sir.

Thank for Your reply and thanks for You videos, which I sometimes watch and study several times while taking notes.

It will be interesting to see if the premises and terms can stand a further scrutiny, because its correctness could imply a hypothesis that distinguish between humans and the primate homo sapiens as only the bearers of culture and civilisation can be said to have distinguished themselves from the animal kingdom.

Sometimes it is interesting to work ad absurdum!

[fidelbogen]

@kurtbirk I am honored that you listen repeatedly and take notes. Dang, that's dedication! ;-)

If you are a glutton for punishment, I recommend the following, which is on my blog:

counterfem(dot)blogspot(dot)co­m/search?q=sector+system+brief­ly+explained

[kurtbirk]

Fidelbogen, Sir.

Since men are the makers and founders of society and men thus formalize the terms of interaction in that society, i.e. property rights, equal rights according to the law etc. doesn't that mean that male 'voting rights' are natural/negative and that female voting rights are positive/given rights.

If so, then male voting rights must be of a higher order than female?

[fidelbogen]

@kurtbirk That's an interesting angle that you bring to the issues.

And to be sure, formally correct according to the terms and premises laid out.

[aristochat3]

Can cut out the social contract. There is no such thing. the concept of a social contract was invented by an administrative class to justify itself.The state shows itself time and again that it does not have any moral underpinning, precisely because there is no binding contract. The state is nothing more than an agency that has a monopoly on violence. This monopoly in a democracy can be usurped by anybody with a majority and a promise, precisely what feminism is doing

[fidelbogen]

@aristochat3

Yup, I agree with most of what you are saying. But for the sake of the argument I admitted the social contract as a theoretical construct.

And. . . there IS a social contract. Every time you and your neighbor agree to follow a consistent code of ethics with each other, it's an elementary social contract.

[crypter27]

You can see the results,when we see the state getting in to personal matters!

[BobbyL5757]

Brilliant! Feminism = Totalitarian state. Check.

[Razlo5000]

Very, VERY interesting commentary here bogen. I'm so very grateful the MRM has such intellectual heavyweights like you in it's ranks.

[aristochat3]

Btw the administrative class in uk for example is 2/3 women. It is clearly not an equal opportunities employer from a gender perspective.

[aristochat3]

Fidelbogen There is at best a non binding implied agreement between neighbors. A voluntary, mutually beneficial code of conduct. This is not the same as a contract. the administrative class tries to make the false claim that this implied agreement is binding and then uses that false claim as a justification to maintain and manage the monopoly on violence. One could argue that the 'administrator class' uses the same guilt against the sovereign individual that your video suggests. Perhaps Femini