Sounds interesting the only caveat I might add is the problems arising from nano materials in the human body and the links to genetic damage that are being reported.
hmmm...lets see..grandma gets a new hip...dad gets that limb he lost in nam back.. uncle fester gets his finger that got cut off saving that lady in that fire... or....Fido and whiskers get to roam freely deely living off of us for ever. think about it like that...mind you animal testing is done on friggin rats you dumb ass tree-hugger. they stopped using chimps and shit in the 80's. so what will it be your family's well being or some stupid healthy mutt slobering all over the couch>?
(part2) Other ways for research can be explored or created, fact is that using animals is cheaper and easier. They are forced into the role of a product. Use them until they break then get a new one...... Also I don't dismiss the "importance" <--(debatable) of the research conducted in the past, I just don't like it how it got to this point. For example you also exist because in the past lots of bad things happened. They contributed to your existence, but are you fine with that? Probably not.
Yes the goal of the tests are the same. Testing a product on behalf of an organism so you can minimalize the risk-factor that the end-product will have. Main difference is men can choose animals are forced into being test subjects. And why do side effects, NEED to be researched (assuming u meant on animals) before human trials? That's a rule you just adapted while it is made up by men. Think outside the box please.
a crash test is not the same as a drug test.. side effects need to be researched befor human trials are allowed.
this mans statement that a very large % of drugs we use every day were tested on animals first..this includes vaccines, which u urself have accepted for fear of getting the diseases.
u personally have used products which were tested on many hundreds of rats. so dont sit enjoying the fruits of that research and dismis its importance.
That is cool, you can also create artificial muscle with carbon Nanotubes which
will lead to a new type of prosthetic limbs.
EATHER2468 5 months ago
this is the first step of ppl turning into robots
scaryclown34 11 months ago
@Ahya728 the problem is they aren't moving fast enough.
PinkProgram 1 year ago
primitive life is boring cuz it has NOTHING.
hand2handc 2 years ago
this is bitch. japanese are making us move fast unto the future, were life gets boring
Ahya728 2 years ago
Sounds interesting the only caveat I might add is the problems arising from nano materials in the human body and the links to genetic damage that are being reported.
jasonlittlejohn89 2 years ago
hmmm...lets see..grandma gets a new hip...dad gets that limb he lost in nam back.. uncle fester gets his finger that got cut off saving that lady in that fire... or....Fido and whiskers get to roam freely deely living off of us for ever. think about it like that...mind you animal testing is done on friggin rats you dumb ass tree-hugger. they stopped using chimps and shit in the 80's. so what will it be your family's well being or some stupid healthy mutt slobering all over the couch>?
SpyTheChochaMan 2 years ago
(part2) Other ways for research can be explored or created, fact is that using animals is cheaper and easier. They are forced into the role of a product. Use them until they break then get a new one...... Also I don't dismiss the "importance" <--(debatable) of the research conducted in the past, I just don't like it how it got to this point. For example you also exist because in the past lots of bad things happened. They contributed to your existence, but are you fine with that? Probably not.
ramslak 2 years ago
Yes the goal of the tests are the same. Testing a product on behalf of an organism so you can minimalize the risk-factor that the end-product will have. Main difference is men can choose animals are forced into being test subjects. And why do side effects, NEED to be researched (assuming u meant on animals) before human trials? That's a rule you just adapted while it is made up by men. Think outside the box please.
ramslak 2 years ago
a crash test is not the same as a drug test.. side effects need to be researched befor human trials are allowed.
this mans statement that a very large % of drugs we use every day were tested on animals first..this includes vaccines, which u urself have accepted for fear of getting the diseases.
u personally have used products which were tested on many hundreds of rats. so dont sit enjoying the fruits of that research and dismis its importance.
lejink 2 years ago