Uploader Comments (convorelay)
All Comments (23)
-
@IronTeeth27 OR one of YOUR provider you are using.
-
@MrJerryFinch Ok, Sorry, I don't agree with you. Look at Sorenson provides free equipments while most VRS providers do SELL products and many deaf individuals would have to buy. So, that costs a lot of money to Sorenson to provide equipment then why are you complaining about it?
-
@only1rayni Really? You think the proposal rate is fair? Sorry, I don't agree with you. Sorenson provides thebest quality service. Thank you for your wonderful remark.
-
I love the video creative. It deliver a clear message on what the new fcc proposition means.
-
Yeah I hear that. that suck! hey, you from other video that funny "that's Me"?
-
It is a bit disappointing that you are supporting the greed of a certain VRS provider as you will not incur tier 3 rates unless you exceed $3m a month. This is the first scare myth. Second most of the quality of video and technology is already paid and in place so threatening that the quality will drop is myth number two. Come on Convo please rise above the gutter politics!
-
Something to be aware of. Under current law, VOIP services do not have to pay into the TRS fund. HR 3101 and S 3304 would correct this. This is needed because more people are dropping landline services...resulting in shrinking of the TRS fund.
-
Whatever happened to the t-shirts your company were supposed to give out to those who made vlogs supporting covorelay. Many havent received them. And what are we to believe your company? Your vlog makes your company look like Sorenson.
-
@chadaludwig Agree!
Check our website for the open letter from Ed Bosson to the deaf community.
convorelay 1 year ago