Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Jim Rogers Adam Smith for President in 2012

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
11,617
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • RON PAUL/ JIM ROGERS !!!

  • @EVRYMANaKING Agree man, Ron Paul is America's last hope.

see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @firefox666moll I hope that holding cost won't exceed the small gains you realise in your pirate treasure.

  • @shelzoth No, i must hold mine, in a suit case hidden, this is my choice my friend, just like pirate treasure, good luck with your'e paper silver and gold.ENGLAND,

  • @firefox666moll no, buy gold/silver stocks because they are very undervalued in comparison to the spot price of the two commodities.

  • jim rogers needs to speak out about his time with George Soros.

  • never realized that Rogers was a fan of William McChesney Martin (April 2, 1951 – February 1, 1970). I thought he too was criticized for monetizing LBJ's welfare & warfare buildup.

  • @yoyuepz Are you kidding me? Do your homework. Smith wasn't the only liberal in that time and he certainly wasn't the only free market economist. Smith was a narcist.

    The problem is that it is ambiguous and can be interpreted in many ways. Like Marx did. The UK industrial revolution by the way started in my country, The Netherlands, and was brought about by the decentralization of power. Not by some badly written economics book with clueless economic theory. It has nothing to do with Smith.

  • @Olavo88 Without Smith there be no free market place. The uk industrial revolution would not even existed. And what smith is stated free market place is happening in other countries such as china, yes china is controled but they have liberal laws for businsses far better than any western company. Yes its badly written but you need to understand it was 1776 - and need to read between the lines of what he was talking about.

  • @yoyuepz Maybe u should read some more. After economists long figured out that value is subjective, Smith shunted economics off on the wrong road by reinstating the labor theory of value that eventually led to marxism. The things he got right were stolen. Smith copied large chunks from for example Cantillon. He was a shameless plagiarist. The Wealth of Nations is badly written, ambiguous, and vague. There are many other (really bad) things to mention but I'm out of space. Good luck.

  • @Olavo88 Do you even know who Adam Smith is? You better go and read his book then come back here and review your comment

  • Wrong Jim. Adam Smith didn't know jack shit.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more