Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Apollo 1 Pure Oxygen Fire 1967

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
69,448
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 18, 2008

On January 27, 1967, tragedy struck the Apollo program when a flash fire occurred in command module 012 during a launch pad test of the Apollo/Saturn space vehicle being prepared for the first piloted flight, the AS-204 mission. Three astronauts, Lt. Col. Virgil I. Grissom; Lt. Col. Edward H. White,and Roger B. Chaffee died in this tragic accident. Causes of the fire included the use of a 100% oxygen atmosphere, much flammable material used in the cockpit and many sources of ignition present. After the fire the Apollo project was grounded. In hindsight the command module was understood to be extremely hazardous and in some instances, carelessly assembled. Many design changes were made. In March 1961, Soviet cosmonaut Valentin Bondarenko was killed when a fire started in the pure-oxygen atmosphere of an isolation chamber but the USSR concealed this tragedy for over 20 years. However, the design hazards of a 100% oxygen environment had been well described by 1967 and many deaths from flash fires in pure oxygen at or near sea-level pressure had been publicly reported during the 1950s and 60s. A 1966 editorial in the journal Space/Aeronautics asserted "The odds are that the first spaceflight casualty due to environmental exposure will occur not in space, but on the ground", and further noted that safety protocols for the Apollo project were thoroughly lacking. For more on this tragedy, go to http://history.nasa.gov/Apollo204/

The history of space exploration has been marred by a number of tragedies that resulted in the deaths of the astronauts or ground crew. As of 2007, in-flight accidents have killed 19 astronauts, training accidents have claimed 11 astronauts, and launchpad accidents have killed at least 71 ground personnel. About two percent of the manned launch/reentry attempts have killed their crew, with Soyuz and the Shuttle having almost the same death percentage rates. About five percent of the people that have been launched have died doing so (because astronauts often launch more than once). As of November 2004, 439 individuals have flown on spaceflights. Twenty-two have died while in a spacecraft: three on Apollo 1, one on Soyuz 1, one on X-15-3, three on Soyuz 11, seven on Challenger, and seven on Columbia. By space program, 18 NASA astronauts (4.1%) and four Russian cosmonauts (0.9% of all the people launched) died while in a spacecraft. Soyuz accidents have claimed the lives of four, versus fourteen for Shuttle accidents. No deaths have occurred on Soyuz missions since 1971, and none with the current design of the Soyuz. Including the early Soyuz design, the average deaths per launched crew member on Soyuz are currently under two percent. However, there have also been several serious injuries, and some other incidents in which crews nearly died. NASA astronauts who have lost their lives in the line of duty are memorialized at the Space Mirror Memorial at the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex in Merritt Island, Florida. Cosmonauts who have died in the line of duty under the auspices of the Soviet Union were generally honored by burial at the Kremlin Wall Necropolis in Moscow. For more information, go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_space_disasters . This was clipped from the 1975 NASA film, Time of Apollo.

  • likes, 10 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Three American Heroes.

  • @spacepatrolman sorry, its all NASA lingo.

    CM = Command Module (Capsule)

    012 = the serial number. 001-020 were Block-I CM

    012 = the "10th" CM produced by North American Aviation used by NASA aka =Apollo 1

    CM014 was disassembled as part of the Apollo 1 investigation. and it never flew.

    CM017 was next. it was inspected and rejected by NASA (socket and over 1,400 other defects noted ) it

    was repaired and had several Block II revisions installed and later flew for the unmanned Apollo 4 flight.

see all

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Kill a few Americans then dare the remaining to forget their legacy and sacrifice. Yeah right! Big bucks runs this society.

  • NASA got one thing right with the space shuttle; killing people.

  • @Doctor699 I just realized that the space shuttle being an airplane as well as a space craft, When you think about it, they were beginning a new flight when they fired their thrusters for decent. But they were doing this without preflighting their aircraft, and it bit them. Wing damage is a TYPICAL problem for aircraft, but NASA didn't look at the shuttle that way. Point A is the Earth and point B is orbit. When they return from point B they must do another pre-flight inspection.

  • @JetMechMA Agreed. They just took too much for granted. Then again, if the fire had not occurred, they might never have made it to the moon before 1970.

  • Human factors is what caused Challenger and Columbia. The EXACT same complacency caused Columbia as caused Challenger. They FAILED to learn their lesson. FOD damage was a known factor but came to be overlooked. Launching in cold weather was questioned, but dismissed. They were getting stop signals in both cases but proceeded anyway. Arrogance. It wasn't the O-ring that brought Challenger down, it was arrogance and a callous disregard for human life.

  • @Doctor699 You've stated the real cause of the Apollo One fire. It was a human factors thing called Norms. They had become confident using 100% oxygen and came to think they could handle it. I think this was partly because at the time they began to think of the space program as ultra-modern and that they were some sort of futuristic pioneers...rather than engineers and technicians. Norms....Complacency....it was one of them....or more than one, but it came down to "human factors in safety."

  • @1MtnBoy I dont know what all this cmo gibberish is

  • @spacepatrolman read my reply below. it is documented in CM017, AFTER the fire in CM012.

    there was never any socket found in CM012, it is documented in the report - ( enclosure #27) that is #CM017, not Apollo 1 #CM012. shown in the photograph, it's not burnt black.........hello ?

  • @1MtnBoy how do you know its not true when it has been documented in books and photographs

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more