Apollo 1 Pure Oxygen Fire 1967
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (48)
-
Kill a few Americans then dare the remaining to forget their legacy and sacrifice. Yeah right! Big bucks runs this society.
-
NASA got one thing right with the space shuttle; killing people.
-
@Doctor699 I just realized that the space shuttle being an airplane as well as a space craft, When you think about it, they were beginning a new flight when they fired their thrusters for decent. But they were doing this without preflighting their aircraft, and it bit them. Wing damage is a TYPICAL problem for aircraft, but NASA didn't look at the shuttle that way. Point A is the Earth and point B is orbit. When they return from point B they must do another pre-flight inspection.
-
@JetMechMA Agreed. They just took too much for granted. Then again, if the fire had not occurred, they might never have made it to the moon before 1970.
-
Human factors is what caused Challenger and Columbia. The EXACT same complacency caused Columbia as caused Challenger. They FAILED to learn their lesson. FOD damage was a known factor but came to be overlooked. Launching in cold weather was questioned, but dismissed. They were getting stop signals in both cases but proceeded anyway. Arrogance. It wasn't the O-ring that brought Challenger down, it was arrogance and a callous disregard for human life.
-
@Doctor699 You've stated the real cause of the Apollo One fire. It was a human factors thing called Norms. They had become confident using 100% oxygen and came to think they could handle it. I think this was partly because at the time they began to think of the space program as ultra-modern and that they were some sort of futuristic pioneers...rather than engineers and technicians. Norms....Complacency....it was one of them....or more than one, but it came down to "human factors in safety."
-
@1MtnBoy I dont know what all this cmo gibberish is
-
@spacepatrolman read my reply below. it is documented in CM017, AFTER the fire in CM012.
there was never any socket found in CM012, it is documented in the report - ( enclosure #27) that is #CM017, not Apollo 1 #CM012. shown in the photograph, it's not burnt black.........hello ?
-
@1MtnBoy how do you know its not true when it has been documented in books and photographs
Three American Heroes.
EmilyAlwayz 3 years ago 25
@spacepatrolman sorry, its all NASA lingo.
CM = Command Module (Capsule)
012 = the serial number. 001-020 were Block-I CM
012 = the "10th" CM produced by North American Aviation used by NASA aka =Apollo 1
CM014 was disassembled as part of the Apollo 1 investigation. and it never flew.
CM017 was next. it was inspected and rejected by NASA (socket and over 1,400 other defects noted ) it
was repaired and had several Block II revisions installed and later flew for the unmanned Apollo 4 flight.
1MtnBoy 4 months ago