Re: Darwin is not Herbert Spencer - Social Darwinism

Was Herbert Spencer a Social Darwinist? (Am I?)
Wirkman Virkkala
http://insteadofablog.com/2004.07.20.shtml

A great book, but . . .
Protagoras
http://proportionalbelief.blogspot.com/2005/09/great-book-but.html

Herbert Spencer: The Defamation Continues
Roderick T. Long
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig3/long3.html

Defaming Herbert Spencer? A Reply to Edwin Black
Roderick T. Long
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig3/long5.html

Marx and Spencer: Celebrity Death Match
Roderick T. Long
http://praxeology.net/unblog04-04.htm#10

Too Awful to Read? Susan Jacoby on Herbert Spencer
Roderick T. Long
http://www.lewrockwell.com/long/long10.html

Once More Unto the Breach
Roderick T. Long
http://praxeology.net/unblog08-05.htm#08

Happy Birthday, Herbert Spencer
Roderick T. Long
http://praxeology.net/unblog04-05.htm#04

Herbert Spencer, Labortarian
Roderick T. Long
http://praxeology.net/blog/2007/04/10/herbert-spencer-labortarian

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Herbert
• Spencer
• social
• darwinism
• hitler
• atheist
• darwin
• naomi94

[Harpakhrad11]

Testing

[bigwhammyRocks]

The book's full title is On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, while for the 6th edition of 1872 the title was changed to The Origin of Species.

"Favored Races" <- QED

[Harpakhrad11]

That is true, but I fail to see what that has to do with the video or the articles.

[Harpakhrad11]

"that shows insecurity on your part"~ naomi94

I'm not the one that disabled comments on my video.

[naomi94]

sorry dude

i think you are wrong on this one

[Harpakhrad11]

"if it is bullshit - then prove it

use evidence to support your conclusions

if you can not prove it then it is just an opinion" ~ naomi94

[aneanthesieus]

@AtheismCentral you misanderstand me, i never said that i was strong nor weak, but i wish a superior human race. spencer did not think of that but my idea came from the roots of is. and of course i will die before that happen but i dont care, i care more about the fact that humanity may evolve then my own life.im not a pathetic being who think only of himself. plus they are inferiors humans , we are not equal,so stop with ur christians morals.

[AtheismCentral]

@aneanthesieus

I've studied Spencer and Darwin, and no where did they ever speak of a new super human race. Spencer was just an uber-Capitalist cock sucking fuck face. And if your supporting weeding out the weak do you think we would evolve in your life time? Ha, no, you'll be long gone whenever that would happen, suggesting it would. If the theory was correct (which scientifically speaking it's just not sound) Natural selection would probably weed you out first anyway

[AtheismCentral]

@aneanthesieus

who are you to define who is the strong and who are the weak?

Aside from that, I value things such as compassion, kindness, understanding and equality. Weak Human Beings? Tell me what separates you from other people. What makes you individually separate from the rest of the Human race 

[aneanthesieus]

@AtheismCentral of course Darwin was great, but he did not anderstand,that we need to evolve,that natural selection must become artificial selection, and survival of the fitest must become domination of the strong over the weak.just imagine a new breed of super human being.

[AtheismCentral]

@aneanthesieus

Fuck you, and fuck Herber Spencer. Charles Darwin one of my hero's, would laugh at your elitist bullshit.

[aneanthesieus]

@AtheismCentral die you weakling fool

[AtheismCentral]

Fuck herbet spencer