How the ACLU Got Viacom To Treat My YouTube Videos Fairly #1

WATCH PART 2 AT http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIVOZB2K6Y0

Much more information at http://www.liberalviewer.com

See particularly the blog entry from Nicole Ozer, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Northern California's Technology and Civil Liberties Policy Director, at: http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/playing_fair_on_youtube.shtml

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Viacom
• fair
• use
• copyright
• dmca
• youtube
• aclu
• the
• daily
• show
• jon
• stewart
• stephen
• colbert
• report
• comedy
• central
• renetto

[JohnHolmes3000]

The difference between a law firm and a bait shop is that one is full of bloodsuckers, leeches, maggots, bottomfeeders, snakes, nightcrawlers, and other vile, slimy disgusting scum while the other is just a bait shop. My apologies to maggots, snakes, leeches, nightcrawlers, etc. who were offended by this lawyer joke.

[amazingjames311]

this situation you found yourself in isn't off character for large corporate entities.

they will often attemt to claim that you are in the wrong, in regards to rules,regulations,laws often which are disigned to be as confusing as possible.

then if you question the validity they will attempt to bring "large amounts" of money into the arguement.

as an attempt to price check you into submission from fears of penalties.

and then only after you spend money and time will they do what is law.

[SovereignStatesman]

@PaulinaPaulino

First of all shit-head, ALL federal judges are appointed for life-- and last I checked, there were more than 9.

Likewise, if they are impeached and removed then they are no longer federal judges, DERP!

I need constitutional lessons from you, like Chuck Yaeger needs flying lessons from Little Nemo.

[PaulinaPaulino]

@SovereignStatesman What you claim would be true IF there were not a way to remove Judges form their positions.

In 99% of cases, Judges are elected.

In the 1% of cases where they are appointed for life (this covers exactly 9 people) even THEY can be removed by impeachment.

You may be a Sovereign Statesman, but your knowledge of the Constitution is limited at best.

[SovereignStatesman]

@EFFIsAFraud

They're a token-front organization that only chases headlines.

[SovereignStatesman]

@person221

It figures why he has to work for the ACLU, since no firm would hire him.

[SovereignStatesman]

@PaulinaPaulino

It's the fact that thanks to Lincoln and Jackson, the courts now are the supreme and final judge of their own powers, and therefore they've grown far more powerful than originally intended-- and the law has grown accordingly less representative of the People vs. the government.

[SovereignStatesman]

That's easy, the FRCP precludes malicious defense as well as prosecution.

[gamerunknown]

@SovereignStatesman

Ad hominem. Care to address the content of his speech? Preferably with legal arguments, since that's apparently your area of expertise.

[SovereignStatesman]

@atheistchaos

Like Obama!

ROTFLMAO

[SovereignStatesman]

Amazing how he has Stephen Colbert's book among his regular lawbooks.

What a shyster, he never would have made it at Harvard; meanwhile in law school I made the Dean's List and Honor Roll in my first term.