2009 Shanghai - Final: Davydenko vs Nadal (part 2/2)

http://www.tennistube.tv - The #1 Source for Online Tennis Videos

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Shanghai
• 2009
• Final
• Nadal
• vs
• Davydenko
• Widescreen
• HQ
• 002

[69wiwi69]

It seems to me that to beat Nadal, you need to be really really above him in level of play, because nadal wins all the important points : how can there be only 7/6 1/1 when Davydenko is 28 winners/ 28 UO and Nadal 4 winners/ 16 UO ??? that could be stats of a 6/3 6/3 match lol

It's like Nadal beating Fed in AO winning less points...

mental strength is more important in tennis than some can think.

(but I still hate Nadal LOL)

[wagsbass]

i love to see Nadal get beat. Thanks for uploading

[arisklms13]

@3timeMVPNash you have your opinion

I have mine ;)

[MaratSafinVideos]

@3timeMVPNash People will disagree with Agassi but it's clear that Agassi played in a superior era competition wise coupled with the fact there was a huge variety of different surfaces. A prime Agassi against Davydenko would have been a wonderful baseline battle.

[3timeMVPNash]

@arisklms13 Federer, Sampras, Laver, Agassi, Borg.  That's 5 guys that are definitely above Nadal.

[fbinsulation]

dammit Davydenko!!!! Tennis NEEDS YOU BACK

[arisklms13]

@hordak83 .... different conditions. He also wins at least 5 titles a year since 2005 so he is very consitent.

And he also has quite few records...

I'm not trying to say he is the GOAT. He surely isn't.I will put federer in the top spot instead.

But you can't argue he is in the top5 of all time..

[arisklms13]

@hordak83 actually I think Borg and Nadal have the same winning percentage.Nadal's is 82.5 % and Borg's 82.7 %

It's a slight difference...

As fot the other things you said that should really count,I think that Nadal is in the top spots of these caategories.He has a grat record the last 6 years on grass, he's won he's eon 2 grand slams and 5 masters on hard courts and in 2010 he won 3 grand slams in three differnt surfaces so you can say that he has an extremely good ability to adapt to

[hordak83]

@arisklms13 Bjorn Borg has better record than Nadal, for example. Anyways, head-to-head record doesn't necessary means that one player is better than another. Nadal has impressive wining records against lot of players, but because of clay surface. If there would be 2 slams and 4 masters od grass, Sampras would have positive record against almost everybody. Because of that you should count another records, titles, consistency, ability to adapt to different conditions (surfaces) etc.