Gerry Spence opens a can of whup ass
Top Comments
All Comments (61)
-
@theloosecannon707 must not have gone too far in law school if you don't understand the difference between "your" and "you're."
-
man you guys that think you can sound smart by blathering about 'blah that is a legal conclusion negligence blah' don't know what your talking about and your stupid for trying to critique one of the most successful attorneys in american history... i would explain why your wrong and teach you what i learned in the first year of tort law, but then i would be as lame as you... just stop pretending like you know what your talking about and just enjoy Mr. Spence.
-
I wish he was handling my case. I truly hope his underlings are as great as this man. my future depends on it!!!
-
4 stars Clip
-
@kelley66 Except about half or more of his cross is objectionable. For instance, "negligence" is a legal standard, so asking, "are you here to convince the jury the county was not negligent" is highly objectionable as it actually requires he make a conclusion of law. There are other examples here too. So yeah, it's not that great.
-
I wish there were more "good ole boys" like Gerry Spence in this country.
-
The resident litigation experts on here who are critiquing Spence as if they have a tenth of his talent as a trial lawyer are truly freaking hilarious. Thanks for the laughs.
-
His win loss record speaks for itself. Please post yours for comparisson.
-
"Don't you want to answer the question" Good one.
This man is a master litigator who has dedicated his life to making sure the common man going against the sociopolitical giants had a fighting chance at receiving justice. You cannot talk about the great legal minds of the 20th century without mentioning Gerry Spence.
wjiharris 1 year ago 15
But in a court of law, words are scrutinized and easily twisted. Why not prepare yourself to make sure your explanation is air tight as possible?
Tuckeryjdmb 2 years ago 7