Digital Portable Phones and Microwave Radiation on the Electrosensitive

Study shows, unequivocally, that microwave radiation from a cordless digital phone base station operating at 2.4 gigahertz immediately affects the heart causing arrhythmia and tachycardia (irregular and rapid heart rate) at non-thermal levels well below federal guidelines.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• DECT phone
• tachycardia
• irregular heart rate
• arrhythmia
• heart rate variability
• microwave radiation

[RealThermoguy]

Thank you Dr. Havas and your partners for their work. It is very progressive and points out simple science. Humans are really like a coaxial cable without the insulation and are a 7.8 Hz frequency electrical system. If you impose 2.4 GHz or 2.4 billion Hz on 7.8 Hz system, there will be problems for the 7.8 Hz system.

You can't have the interaction of different frequencies, there will be electrical changes. Plug in the internet, no wireless.

[expandingworld]

Very true johanna006. When I became hypersensitive to electrical fields, my primary care physician prescribed -- excercise. But I found an immense body of knowledge and info on electrical pollution and healing related maladies. I am ever grateful that any info at all was shared. Knowledge is the key to change, and wow, is change ever needed.

[IvanAndreevich]

I'm sorry was that gas PEDDLE? Hahahaha :)

[krispykreme123456789]

paul gray



[ccd101]

Subjects B (at 03:33) and C (at 04:04) could claim the $1 million prize at Randi.

(Google for randi one million dollar challenge.)

So, please put them into contact with Randi, Dr. Havas.

[newatheistmovement1]

Any nurse, paramedic, doctor, electrician, or engineer, could point out that the monitor is not selective, and therefore will pick up electrical signals in addition to the frequencies generated on the surface of the skin emanating from the heart.

[newatheistmovement1]

It is always good to have something to compare and contrast with when trying to evaluate the difference between science and pseudo-science. Good to have a frame of reference for that sort of thing.

What recommendations did the Trent Ethics committee have for your study design upon submission?

Anyway, I heard if you wear a tinfoil hat you can protect yourself from the dangerous frequencies, AND keep the voices at bay.

[guitarmusic1]

I'd also like to see the full range of data. That is, did the subject's heart rate increase *every* time the DECT phone was active, and was it normal *every* time the DECT phone was not active? Or is this just a selective sample of data where the correlation exists, and is any data where correlation does not exist excluded (i.e., when the DECT phone was active and subject's heart rate did not increase)?

[guitarmusic1]

I want to see more details on the methodology of this study, particularly (1) whether this was truly double blind and no information was communicated between the subjects and the experimenters that might tip the subjects off as to when the DECT phone was active and (2) whether there was a control group of people who claimed to suffer no EHS.

[kamato8]

Ok, a good proof but... the laptop u where using to monitoring the hart rates, is the wifi of it disabled??. if not the results are less realistic.

[deltaxcd]

Ok, thats prety good proof but because it is qute sensitiv subject, we cant reject posibility of falsification.

so is there more scientists who tested it and got same resultas, or at least someone interested in confirming its results.