Re: Refuting Evolution Part 1
Uploader Comments (Ethrock)
All Comments (13)
-
Couldn't help myself, I decided to finish watching your video anyway =P
So here we go:
First off, pointing out ADAPTATION as EVOLUTION is not proving a point, it's proving you have no idea what your talking about. Tell me, did any of those e-coli turn into a different species? Second, I'd just like to again point out the hypocrisy of you telling us to learn English just because we use the term "Evolutionist" when you yourself use the term "Creationist."
-
You know what I love? How all of your "references"(I use that term VERY loosely) are from Wikipedia(A site which can be edited by ANYONE with a computer) and a pro-evolutionist(btw, if you can use the term "Creationist" *see 2:22* I don't see why your flipping out about the other guy using the term "Evolutionist") site, which is very biased. Provide me with some primary sources and I might actually finish watching your video...
-
those fossils were just put there by satan anyway.
-
Let them use evolutionist, its an example of evolution of language in action, somewhat ironic I think. Also, the reason latin is used in taxonomy is that its a dead language and the meaning will remain forever constant.
-
Bling is in the oxford dictionary. It's still a slur word.
-
He actually believes all that?
*hug* thank you!
kipsdoomvlog 2 years ago
lol your welcome
Ethrock 2 years ago
Wow, mostly every thing this kid put up is basically - guesses. Evolutionist, not a word? How about "Evolutionism". I hereby coin this a new word!
lexscripta1 3 years ago
Actually they are all documented with many papers and lots of work. References, they're wonderful. I used them.
Ethrock 3 years ago
Who names these things? Maybe if they were named things like poodiddle or feedo cretards wouldn't have such a hard time. Who knows?
hanzo138 3 years ago
Latin, makes them sound cooler and ensures retards struggle to learn them.
Ethrock 3 years ago