Brian Williams Interviewing David Restuccio

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,312
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 21, 2010

No description available.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • "Like watching the collapse of an active volcano....." which means A LOT OF ENERGY WAS NEEDED TO BRING THIS BUILDING DOWN and thus create a PYROCLASTIC FLOW!!!

    Curious how the plume seems to keep going up and up towards the end of this clip. A few office fires and gravity can not make that happen.

  • "Demolished for Safety" was the first official story. That is why we got the story from so many officials! At the last minute, Rudy Giuliani or some other sissy bureaucrat decided that story was too rough, too close to the truth, or otherwise too dangerous to let the public have it. That's why "fire collapse" and "fell down by itself" were sent out instead, lame as they might be.

see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Even if the story was that they had to plant explosives to safely collapse the buildings, the explosives would have had to have been planted well in advance of 911, which indicate malice of forethought on the part of those who planted the explosives. Also, the impact and fire only killed part of the 3000 that died that day. It was the collapse of the buildings that killed most! Later, the firefighters, first responders, and cleanup crews would start dropping like flies.

  • @jbrider555 actually, a ton of spelling errors in the second half really ruin the article, who the fuck proofread this tihng? lol, it's still a good read though :)

  • @jbrider555 That's a well written article, thanks!

  • @no2globalism

    I think Bill Clinton wants to answer that:

    "How dare you? How dare you?"

  • "You guys knew this was coming all day." asked Williams

    "We had heard reports that the building was unstable." responds Restuccio.

    My question...Who were these reports coming from?

  • "... or it would be taken down. I would imagine it came down on its own"?

    What other POSSIBLE way could it have come down that day - unless its destruction had been pre-planned?

    Those who say "the firemen knew it was coming down" therefore they must have seen it was unstable from the fires are full of it. This clip shows that they KNEW it was coming down because they had been TOLD it was coming down - either "on its own" or pulled. Thanks for posting this.

  • Looks like the last sentence is cut off.. like he wants to say "..but it was taken down."

    Very suspicious editing here, for my taste.

  • @Skeptic121 "Nowadays they just rewrite government press releases." Yeah, makes you wonder where they got that "would be taken down" from, huh? Sounds like they were talking to the same people Silverstein was before he got the go ahead from his insurers to "pull it".

    watch?v=9Q5S0ehGhR4

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more