Top Comments
All Comments (52)
-
@ImaginationAnimation It has been a year but actually you can see the stars very well from the moon. The reason you don't see them in footage is because of the cameras used. The moon is a good place to put a telescope because of the lack of distortion caused by the atmosphere.
-
Yeah, not in fahrenheit or anything, hehe!: )
-
measured in C, right? :P
-
Hehe, how dumb and ignorant do you have to be to believe that the moon landings were huge hoaxes? I think you almost have to have room-temperature IQ or something.. : )
-
Actually, in some ways, it' BETTER to send a man into the dangerous areas, because a man can react better to unknown situations then a robot can.
-
Yeah pretty scary : )
I dont think they will go inside, will they? Seems too dangerous to even consider. Maybe they can drop in a rover or roll a ball probe down the side.
-
Not enough ram to animate all of them. This is a simulation, you know.:)
-
Hey Dim Wit guss what !
On the moon you can't see stars and MAN did land on the moon.
Now I bet you'll complain "But on Apollo 11 why was the flag rippling?" Well the fact is the the horizontil poll didn't enstend well and the frabric got scrunched up.
I am an AUSSIE and you are an AMERICAN and you don't even belive that your own men landed on the moon!
One more thing I am only 12 years old and I know all this.
-
Holy shoite. That is one freakishly huge crater.
-
harrisonhiroyuki: You sir are a Richard Cranium!!
The Russians would have made a lot of noise if it had been a hoax. They had the equipment to check.
chrthiel 3 years ago 11
lol thanks, I guess I don't know as much about subatomic particles as I thought I did. I'll stick with my Biology XP
but yea, it was Helium-3 that I was thinking about, I forgot exactly where I read it and apparently what they said verbatim. My apologies and thank you for correcting me.
DamienZshadow 3 years ago 5