SVO Mustang Commerical
Uploader Comments (lindaleparkrolo)
Top Comments
-
I own an 1986 SVO Competition Prep I have been in a Probe there is no comparison in the two.
All Comments (40)
-
Probe Ya there is a car NOT!!! I think the Pinto sounds better even with a exploding gas tank!!!!!
-
ahh the good ole days when no ricers said they had =4823=49823=489123=4923 horse power in there civics lol an american four cylnder is the the only inline four that can produce 750 hp
-
i want one of these sooooooo bad ='( ive already got a 1994 gt and 1996 mystic cobar so i wanna add one of these to my collection
-
@norwood1026 Just love the DIVE in the front end when they slam on the brakes. Wow wish I had one of these! NOT!!!
-
@norwood1026 why are u arguing with everyone lol go watch a probe video
-
@FireMario87 Reliable yes not the mazda enegine had counterbalance shafts that made the engine much smoother the the entire RPM band then the Ford 2.3.
-
@xsonz2 On a road course yes but not in a straight line.
-
@norwood1026 I don't know Why The 1989 Mustang G.T didn't Have all around disc
and air shock all around do you know How Safe That car Will Be !! OMG!
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Probe was a better motor at least the V-6 was. The 2.3 is an old pinto engine. I would of liked to see a turbo V-8 instead of a forced fed four.
norwood1026 1 year ago
@norwood1026 That's your opinion and you know what they say about those :P
lindaleparkrolo 1 year ago 10
This car was ahead of it's time but Mustang people didn't care about hnadling they cared more about straight line speed. I have to wonder why Ford didn't carry over the better brakes, Etc on the V-8. I remember a time when the Probe GT Turbo was going to replace the V-8 People wrote in & it was never a done deal.
norwood1026 1 year ago
@norwood1026 Who wants a probe motor in a mustang LOL I'll stick with my 2.3 turbo
lindaleparkrolo 1 year ago 3