Up Drunk & Personal with Rebecca Watson

I get up drunk & personal with Rebecca Watson of http://skepchick.org. She's also part of the rawkin podcast, Skeptics Guide to the Universe http://theskepticsguide.org/.

Her Wedding:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFZgNKZN1Qs

Her YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/user/rkwatson

Beginning music royalty-free by incompetech.

http://www.incompetech.com/

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• healthyaddict
• healthy
• addict
• rebecca
• watson
• skepchick
• calendar
• up
• drunk
• and
• personal
• rkwatson
• dragon
• con
• atl
• 2009

[anthonzi]

We have plenty of Bla ck athe ists thank you (? original was filtered)

Also what is wrong with debating feminist causes? Did you really think that you'd get away with unsubstantiated statements in a Skeptical environment? There are good feminist causes and bad feminist causes, and they should be open to reason and debate. Same goes for race theory. Reality can support itself.

[healthyaddict]

We do - but none that are prominent speakers in the communities - so that was the point.

[Canadageist]

@anthonzi Rebecca Watson bans everyone who says anything she doesn't like, and she has an ego bigger than Star Jones. Here's what Rebecca Watson wrote to me:

"You got banned because you're a nobody. I am asked to speak at dozens of conferences a year and I'm the skeptic movement's most well-known personality. Who the fuck are you? NOBODY. You're a loser and that's why you don't get to post on my channel. Goodbye."

[9886635574]

Fuck this hypocritical, pseudo-intellectual rebecca bitch 

[riggermortisify]

@Jomunrek It's so tiring seeing these people have to get the same things explained to them over and over in every way possible yet refuse to understand but SOMEHOW disagree! Somehow claim that they KNOW it's wrong.

It'd be like me going to China and telling everyone there that they're not talking Chinese. I don't know Chinese but I do know they aren't speaking it correctly.

Equivalent to police arresting someone for murder because they can't prove that they didn't do it. Frustrating.

[2LegHumanist]

You could get a role on criminal minds. I just made you the unsub.

[atheistrocker100]

Wow shes boring

[nuggbubbler]

bitch looks like Kennedy from MTV

[TheDensley7]

I know all about dialectics thank you. Who the fuck are you? Ludwig Wittgenstein?

[Jomunrek]

You had proposed as an argument that I can't prove god doesn't exist and I pointed out that the burden of proof is on the person making the claim, not the person asking for evidence. Look up "the burden of proof". It's clear you are not well versed in dialectics, study up and you probably won't bother continuing this. Start with "logical fallacies" and then take any argument for a specific god and you'll find that they all fall under one or more fallacies, thus they are not logical.

[TheDensley7]

Is that it? All problems have been solved in 2 sentences? Next please.

[Jomunrek]

The burden of proof falls on those claiming there is something where others say "there's nothing there."

saying no one can prove you wrong is not a valid argument.

Next please