Violet Blue's Facebook Group false flagged. PornHarms claims victory.

Violet Blue's "Our Porn, Ourselves" group on Facebook has been false flagged. PornHarms is claiming this as a victory for their side.

Blog posts with more on this:

http://days.maybemaimed.com/post/872097325/anti-porn-is-pro-censorship-even-i...
http://violetblue.posterous.com/my-letter-to-facebook-about-removing-the-our

Let these people know how you feel about the censorship they are advocating:

http://www.youtube.com/user/PornHarms
http://www.facebook.com/PornHarms?v=wall
http://www.youtube.com/user/AntiPornographyBlog

Ownership of PornHarms.org:

http://whois.domaintools.com/pornharms.org

Who's filthier, kink or antiporn activists?:

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/06/24/talking-sex-with-k...

Anti-porn logic would censor anti-porn websites:

http://days.maybemaimed.com/post/881329159/anti-porn-logic-would-censor-anti-...

Google caches of deleted group:

http://vb.ly/opo1
http://vb.ly/opo2
http://vb.ly/opo3
http://vb.ly/opo4

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Violet Blue
• antiporn
• censorship
• PornHarms

[iamcuriousblue]

I just found out today that BBW porn star April Flores, aka Fatty D had her Facebook group taken down.

Fuckers.

[iamcuriousblue]

And now, looking at the Violet Blue blog post I linked to above, as well as twitter(dot)com/porn_harms , we see that DianaBoston has involved herself. Figures. That this radical-socialist-lesbian-sepa­ratist-or-whatever is now carrying water for someone from the Family Research Council is an irony not lost on me.

[iamcuriousblue]

H/T to Suzanne Forbes @CarnalNation for the shoutout!

[YeOldeHeretic]

Thanks for getting the message out there iamcuriousblue! Of course I agree that actually porn should be out of the reach of children, but if what I am seeing is the correct 'justifications', then there are plenty of easier ways for children to access it. This unfortunately does appear to be sour grapes.

[iamcuriousblue]

@YeOldeHeretic

And as it turns out, this "objectionable" link in question was a spam message! I find the whole idea of taking sites down for what they link to, much less if they link to a site that links to a site, to be pretty fucking weak to put it mildly. (Uh oh, I said a bad word!)

[YeOldeHeretic]

@YeOldeHeretic *actual that is.

[xxxild]

@iamcuriousblue That's truly sad. They censor the very people or person running the youtube channel.

[iamcuriousblue]

@xxxild

As a response to my response to PornHarms initial post, PornHarms left three identical copies of their original post.

I guess this is what happens when you talk to a robot.

[xxxild]

@xxxild Was something else taken down or just Our Porn Ourselves so far.

[xxxild]

@PornHarms Indeed anti-porn activists on youtube often discuss sites they find offensive and it's very easy to type in the website mentioned and find the site itself. I did this today, in fact. This is a reach and you are proud to support censorship of ideas. I noticed your tweet of celebration. You are celebrating the false flagging of a page that did not contain porn and this is extremely low and not tolerated in this community here on youtube. Respond please.