Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Massachusetts MGM Bill Public Hearing

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
700 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 15, 2010

Selected testimonies from the Massachusetts MGM Bill (S. 1777) Public Hearing at the State House on March 2, 2010.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • It's about time something gets done about this

  • Keep fighting the good fight!

see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Go to Foregen.org and help to make it a reality for those that the law failed to protect.

  • It's too bad that the Congress of Massachusetts had their hearing aids turned off! They are obviously resistant to the truth and have little concern for Human Rights, at least those of boys. The testimony was compelling, the opposition was pathetic, the only logical thing to do would be to PASS THIS BILL!

    Why did they stop it? What is their agenda?

  • umad?

  • It's nice to see some intelligent people in this fucking chaotic world.

  • Today mothers have no excuse,no reason to allow circumcision. There should be no such ignorance regarding the anatomy and physiology of the essential tool (pardon the pun) for intercourse.

    So please, please; all you mothers out there don't allow this to happen to your son. Learn the facts and let your son make this decision himself. It is his right.

  • My husband was circumcised at 2yrs old. The essential mechanism for introitus is absent in him. He had to unconsciously adapt his mechanics in adulthood when he first had sexual intercourse, not realising, as many circumcised men do not realize, what damage had been done to him through circumcision. Of course his mother was unaware of the damage she indirectly caused to her son too. She was completely ignorant of the anatomy and physiology.

  • The circumcised penis continually removes essential secretions during the act of intercourse, natural lubrication is drawn out to the outside & evaporates in the air; an intact penis (with the foreskin in place) keeps essential lubrication where it should be, inside the vagina, ensuring smooth pleasurable intercourse.

  • Only the individual concerned should have that right, to make that decision for himself at an age of understanding. It is a life changing irreversible operation which removes nerves necessary for a fulfilling orgasm. I know what intercourse with a circumcised partner can do to a relationship over time. Intercourse is painful, without the continuing natural lubrication which is not retained in the vagina.

  • Let all those that think it is fine to circumcise a baby search their consciousness. They are guilty, not only of depriving the circumcised individual but also that male's partner, from having a fulfilling sensual relationship. The law should not allow circumcision of male babies.

  • There is no moral, rational basis to not pass this bill out of committee. There was overwhelming evidence presented and only the feeblest opposition.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more