Critical analysis of "Case for a creator" part 1

part one

Category:

Education

Tags:

• extantdodo
• Critical
• analysis
• creationism
• case
• for
• creator
• behe
• intelligent
• design
• ID
• wells
• discovery
• institue
• meyer

[kimintacoma]

Is this a joke? This is a critical analysis?

[sonoftheking85]

This honestly sounds like a typical angry rant from an anti-christian atheist. Not saying all atheists are anti-christian. There are atheists, and then there are atheists who have to angrily argue, insult, and try to refute everyone's beliefs. That is what I believe to be at work here.

[sonoftheking85]

A poorly composed analysis criticizing Lee Strobel. If there were substance to the claims, there would be no need to criticize the structure, composition, styling, and music of the film to add much needed weight to the argument. The contradiction in all this is, the poster's criticism about the set up of the authoritive figure presenting this information. What authority does the editor of this video have as compared to Lee Strobel?

[sonoftheking85]

@dessertthingy Science can neither prove nor disprove the supernatural. The reply from TheZooCrew is one-sided. Just like there is no scientific evidence to suggest something supernatural exists, there is no scientific evidence to prove it does not exist.

[Information39]

@MrDoobious Nor does Strobel mention his "scientists" are his friends from the Discovery Institute (an organization trying to get religion in schools), nor does he mention his "religious science" doesnt hold up in court. Watch Judgement Day: Intelligent Design on Trial. Strobel science is shown to be pure garbage.

[CrippledKnight]

Wow... lol, if this is the best evidence that can be presented agsainst the beforementioned video.. Heh... its like saying... He's wrong just because...

[Dudeatheist]

@mellowsubs

I think you're confused. Atheists don't believe that your god exists. If an atheist hates your god, they hate it like they hate any villain in literature. See your god has committed and ordered genocide and infantcide many times. Yahweh is a butcher.

[Matthysable]

Really just an emotional rant.

This video’s obsessive repetition that “science makes no comment on the supernatural”, revolves around a continual confusion between argument premises and argument implications. Strobel himself clarifies this point on more than one occasion, i.e. intelligent design might have religious implications, but it does not depend on religious premises. The notion of intelligent design is not a comment on the supernatural, but a hypothesis used to explain phenomena.

[orangemod]

"Smashed his new toy !?!? I'll bet his parents worked hard to buy that train for him. Would be the last toy I'd ever buy him if I was his Parents !!! That isn't healthy curiosity of mechanics, it's just a waste of money.

[TheZooCrew]

@dessertthingy

I see someone didn't watch the whole series. The one point applied for editing failure pales in comparison to the number of total errors.

There is no scientific evidence to suggest something supernatural exists, and science is specifically designed to analyze the natural world. Look up the philosophy of science.