Law & Order closing arguments

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
26,539
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 7, 2010

From the season 8 episode: Nullification.

In this episode a group of "resistance fighters" decides to fight against the american government and rob an armored car to fund their resistance. One of their members decides to represent them himself without an attorney. There is overwhelming evidence that they are guilty, but they confuse the jury by arguing that what they believe is righteous. The jury must decide between finding them either guilty, or not guilty via a rare method of acquital called nullification, in which they find them innocent because their crimes were actually justified.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (XellKhaar)

  • Great argument, but if anyone can help me with something...

    I'm looking for a closing argument from the show I believe was done by Carmichael. I don't remember the episode's name, but it was about a couple who buried their infant in the backyard of their in-laws house after it starved to death, and she says something to the effect of "are we really at a point where even feeding our own children is someone else responsibility?"

  • @notgonnasay09 I remember that episode. I think it was season 10, episode 12: Mother's Milk.

  • thank you for posting this video.I actually did not understand everything but i like how sam waterston is acting,the way he plays jack mccoy's character.He's my favorite character and for me waterston's an excellent actor.Great job Mr. McCoy!

  • @syriahaleb McCoy was my favorite character too, it's too bad L&O is over.. It's not the same in LA, I don't have 15-year long attachments to any of the characters. =(

Top Comments

  • Jack and Lenny. I love all the older L&O's I hope Sam Waterston shows up somewhere again.

see all

All Comments (43)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The actor representing the defense attorney Denis O'Hare was the main protagonist in my favorite episode of Law and Order "Pro Se".

  • @Hikash I don't think he would've found much work afterwards. This is where attorney-client privilege should draw a line. If a client says something to his attorney that might be harmful or dangerous, then wouldn't the attorney be held negligent for not bringing such information to the police? Then shouldn't he let them know where the victims are buried for their families? I wouldn't want a hypocrite like that as my lawyer.

  • Jack will always be no.1

  • Are you kiddin' me, the guy was defending fellas who commited armed robbery with murder and he justified it with hatred against the corporations (I don't know the circumstances)? I mean, does this really happen in US?

  • It's sad how those who claim to love this country and its constitution possess the least amount of knowledge and understanding about it.

  • None one messes with Jack

  • Jack is a beast. I love ya Lenny, but Jack is just too good.

  • @voyeurbill "No Bar Association in the country would disbar you."

    "Then shame on them."

  • Jack McCoy makes the show what it is. He owns it, every single time.

  • Jack McCoy lays down the fucking law

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more