Weird Winter - Mad March - Part 1

Join the conversation and support this series at http://www.climatecrocks.com
Part two of this series is at the Yale Climate Forum -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTAZue...

For these and more videos, check out the Glimpse Science Network.
http://glimpsescience.net/

This extraordinary mild winter in north america, followed by an unprecedentedly warm march, has shocked a lot of people who formerly dismissed the reality of climate change.
In addition, several years of violent tornado seasons have many asking if we are entering a "new Normal" in regard to our seasons.
For this two part series, I interviewed a number of climate scientists and experts from around the country, and found some surprising answers.
Part two is available at the Yale Climate Forum
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTAZue...

tornado counts, noaa
http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cm...

Arctic Warming altering weather
http://www.climatecentral.org/news/ar...

Arctic changes and Weather Extremes: NYTimes
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/29/sci...

Jennifer Francis: Linking Weird Weather to Arctic changes
http://e360.yale.edu/feature/linking_...

Jennifer Francis graphs
http://e360.yale.edu/slideshow/loss_o...

Munich Re:Statement of Prof. Peter Hoppe/2010 Press release on climate related Natcats
http://www.munichre.com/en/media_rela...
2011/2011_01_03_press_release.aspx


current tornado stats - US
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/wcm/

shrinking western snowpack
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/539...

• Category

  Science & Technology

[CaptainNobes]

Snow in early November in the North East is Global Warming! LOL

[greenman3610]

this is what I call the "Ah looked out mah winder, an' it wuz snowin', so there cain't be no globull warmin'" fallacy.

Thanks for illustrating that.

[Claudius Denk]

If the science underlying global warming was genuinely supported by empirical evidence it's adherents (alarmists) would present that empirical evidence and the debate would be over. The fact is that there is zero peer-reviewed and/or experimental evidence that CO2 has any kind of thermal effect on the atmosphere. All we have are speculative scenarios based on scant evidence and deceptive computer models, bouyed up by leftist paranoia, environmentalist hysteria, and sciency sounding terminology.

[greenman3610]

for underlying science, see here

watch?v=gIUN5ziSfNc

watch?v=w9SGw75pVas

also google

nasa key indicators

[Claudius Denk]

Let me know if you need any assistance comprehending any of this.

[greenman3610]

thanks, but I rely on the world's best climate scientists, from NASA and elsewhere, with whom I communicate on a regular basis.

Will let you know if I need new nonsense talking points to use as illustrations.

[charles junior]

Another great video, thank you :-)

[tonythatjesusloves]

“The models are convenient fictions

that provide something very useful.”

- Dr David Frame,

climate modeler, Oxford University

[OperationCrossroad]

The tornado season fizzled out in late April because of the weather system that parked itself right on top of tornado alley at that point in time.

On the other hand, that same weather system, just sitting there, caused the worst nationwide drought in over 50 years in the U.S..

So you can now pick your poison: Is going to be a horrendous tornado season or is it going to be a drought?

Take 5 minutes and watch this video -> 2012 Climate Wrap-Up with Paul Douglas

[RealOldOne2]

Hey Peter, now that 2012 is about over, it's time to update your tornado graph you showed @8:14. (1. usa. gov/RYA71Y) & (1. usa. gov/1ah5G3)

ps. Your tornado scare fizzled out. 2012 only had about 2/3 of the NORMAL # of tornados. Once again, the empirical data shows that the CO2-causes extreme climate FAILS. All that extra CO2 must cause FEWER tornados. Crank up those coal fired power plants!

[Claudius Denk]

Mass hysteria created by rent seeking scientific imposters. None of them are doing real science. All of them are participating in a propaganda campaign pretending they see impending disaster.

[Claudius Denk]

I am am a climate scientist. I don't need to rely on others to think for me.

Never trust a scientist that isn't eager to explain the reproducible experimental evidence that underlies their conclusions. Never.

[Claudius Denk]

Thank you for demonstrating that global warming whackos never verify anything they state. They just skip from one absurd notion to the next like 5 year olds watching saturday morning cartoons.

[MasterPCTech]

"The fact is that there is zero peer-reviewed and/or experimental evidence that CO2 has any kind of thermal effect on the atmosphere."

I wish I could say that was the most ignorant thing ever said about one of Greenman's videos, but it's certainly in the top 20. Without CO2, the planet freezes solid, 100% of evidence shows that CO2 absorbs broad spectrum IR...it's how our missiles work for god sakes.

Wow, Claud. You desperately need to go learn LOTS about everything, not just climate.