@baldurus1 True. Bush was the first GOP president to wage war and not raise taxes to pay for military actions. He increased the size of the government more than any other Republican president prior.
@1famekouby Actually the liberals want to tax YOU less, go cry to the party that IS taking all your money. The republicans and libertarians. How you guys can't see trough their bullshit is amazing. Bush cries terrorist and every republican voter are happily reaching for their wallet. Bush cried poor wall street is in trouble and what did you guys do, again happily gave him 700 billion$ so that he could give the money to his buddies.
You're getting screwed in the ass and you're begging for more.
The glaciers on mars are melting because of our SUVs here! We've got to tax the world quickly otherwise we won't be able to save mother earth and mister gore won't be able to work his pyramid scheme! Quick quick tax us more please!
@1famekouby Overwhelming consensus of scientists outweighs the fact that something may seem intuitively inaccurate. Many things which seem absurd are nevertheless scientifically true. "Truth is stranger than fiction" as they say. As for your policy argument, that's a whole other issue, and I can't say I necessarily disagree with you there. But that's no reason to doubt the science.
@baigandine "insane conspiracy theories", you mean along the lines of "the sun has little influence on climate change, the main responsible agent is a gas which composes 0,04% of the atmosphere and is one of the 4 building blocks of the life form known as humans"? Or other "insane conspiracy theories" like "exporting industry to the third world and taxing the first world will help against global warming".
Because when you strip down the arguments to the core principals, that is what they say.
@1famekouby Historical evidence has relevance, but too often it's all people on your side bring. No. It usually comes with insane conspiracy theories. I'd like to see scientific data refuted with science. That's all. What you take this medieval warming period as proof as? That something else could cause global warming besides man? That doesn't really speak to the validity of manmade global warming. Obviously an effect can have more than one cause.
@baigandine Science? Riddle me this, how did my SUV cause the planet to warm after the ice age and little ice age? Thought so
TheNinjaPicker 3 weeks ago
Man made Global warming is a hoax, unless you take money from liberals to study it then its real.
TheNinjaPicker 3 weeks ago
@baldurus1 True. Bush was the first GOP president to wage war and not raise taxes to pay for military actions. He increased the size of the government more than any other Republican president prior.
ShawnsterVideos 4 months ago
@baldurus1 Nah.
Khyrid 4 months ago
@1famekouby Actually the liberals want to tax YOU less, go cry to the party that IS taking all your money. The republicans and libertarians. How you guys can't see trough their bullshit is amazing. Bush cries terrorist and every republican voter are happily reaching for their wallet. Bush cried poor wall street is in trouble and what did you guys do, again happily gave him 700 billion$ so that he could give the money to his buddies.
You're getting screwed in the ass and you're begging for more.
baldurus1 4 months ago
The glaciers on mars are melting because of our SUVs here! We've got to tax the world quickly otherwise we won't be able to save mother earth and mister gore won't be able to work his pyramid scheme! Quick quick tax us more please!
1famekouby 4 months ago
"Overwhelming consensus" what a joke. This just goes to show that you only listen to the global warming apologists, there is NO consensus.
Consensus is not something arrived at in a few years in science even though a lot of people would prefer it to be.
The simple fact you talk of consensus shows you don't even know the amount of scientists who disagree.
Anyone who thinks the sun is not the main cause of the earth's temperature is just to stupid to communicate with anyway... have fun
1famekouby 4 months ago
@1famekouby Overwhelming consensus of scientists outweighs the fact that something may seem intuitively inaccurate. Many things which seem absurd are nevertheless scientifically true. "Truth is stranger than fiction" as they say. As for your policy argument, that's a whole other issue, and I can't say I necessarily disagree with you there. But that's no reason to doubt the science.
baigandine 4 months ago
@baigandine "insane conspiracy theories", you mean along the lines of "the sun has little influence on climate change, the main responsible agent is a gas which composes 0,04% of the atmosphere and is one of the 4 building blocks of the life form known as humans"? Or other "insane conspiracy theories" like "exporting industry to the third world and taxing the first world will help against global warming".
Because when you strip down the arguments to the core principals, that is what they say.
1famekouby 4 months ago
@1famekouby Historical evidence has relevance, but too often it's all people on your side bring. No. It usually comes with insane conspiracy theories. I'd like to see scientific data refuted with science. That's all. What you take this medieval warming period as proof as? That something else could cause global warming besides man? That doesn't really speak to the validity of manmade global warming. Obviously an effect can have more than one cause.
baigandine 4 months ago